Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-710 Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-710 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 2
[All 500-710 Questions]

Which statement about setting up a call bridge cluster for a resilient and scalable Cisco Meeting Server deployment is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sherill
2 months ago
I'm going with B. Keeping the call bridges connected to the master database is the way to go for a reliable setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
2 months ago
Ha! Option A sounds like a recipe for a tangled web. A full mesh database connection? No thank you!
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it could lead to a lot of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, a full mesh database connection sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
2 months ago
But wouldn't allowing call bridges to read/write to any database in a cluster create potential issues with data consistency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
3 months ago
C makes the most sense to me. Limiting to one call bridge per domain ensures consistent configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Emile
29 days ago
True, it's all about finding the right balance between redundancy and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
1 months ago
That's a good point, but having one call bridge per domain can prevent configuration conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have multiple call bridges for redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
2 months ago
I agree, having one call bridge per domain simplifies management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
3 months ago
Because having multiple call bridges in the same domain can cause conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
3 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
3 months ago
D seems too good to be true. Call bridges accessing any database in the cluster at any time? Hmm, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
Golda
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it seems like it could cause some issues with data consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, option D does sound a bit risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The call bridges should only connect to the master database for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option D. It seems risky for call bridges to have full read/write access to any database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
2 months ago
I think option C might also be a good choice. Having only one call bridge per domain could help with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
3 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer. It's important for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77