Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-710 Topic 1 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-710 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 1
[All 500-710 Questions]

Cisco Meeting Server can be deployed using three different deployment models, which option lists deployment models that are the best solution to accommodate fail-over?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Fallon
2 months ago
Fail-over? More like 'Fail-forever' if you choose the wrong option! B) is the way to go, trust me.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
12 days ago
Definitely go with B) scaled and resilient server deployment for fail-over, it's the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
15 days ago
B) scaled and resilient server deployment is definitely the way to go for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
19 days ago
I think B) scaled and resilient server deployment is the most reliable choice for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
1 months ago
I agree, B) scaled and resilient server deployment is the best option for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 months ago
I think B) scaled and resilient server deployment is the most reliable choice for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 months ago
I agree, B) scaled and resilient server deployment is the best option for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
2 months ago
I'm feeling lucky, let's go with A) single combined server deployment. What could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
D) single split server deployment? Really? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'll stick with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should just go with the 'scaled and combined' option to keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
Audra
2 days ago
Nickole: Let's go with 'scaled and combined' then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
6 days ago
User 3: I agree, it's better to go with a solution that offers both scalability and resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
18 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
26 days ago
User 1: I think 'scaled and combined' is a good option for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
2 months ago
B) scaled and resilient server deployment is the way to go for fail-over. Redundancy is key!
upvoted 0 times
Shanda
1 months ago
Yes, scaled and resilient server deployment is the best option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 months ago
I agree, redundancy is definitely key for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dottie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
3 months ago
I agree with Becky, a scaled and resilient server deployment makes sense for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
3 months ago
I think option B is the best solution for fail-over.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77