Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-445 Topic 5 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-445 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 5
[All 500-445 Questions]

How long before incoming activities coming to aliases, for which there are no workflows configured, are moved to the exception queue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The sequence that should be followed while starting ECE is Services server > Message server > Database server > File server > Application server. The other options are not correct sequences.


When starting Cisco Enterprise Chat and Email (ECE), the recommended sequence is:

Start the Services server

Start the Message server

Start the Database server

Start the File server

Start the Application server

This sequence ensures that all the necessary services are running and properly configured before starting the Application server.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sang
2 months ago
Ah, the joys of configuring workflows. It's like playing a game of 'Where's Waldo' but with exception queues. I'm feeling lucky with C, 240 minutes sounds like a nice, relaxing timeout.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
16 days ago
I agree with you, C does sound like a good balance for handling incoming activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
21 days ago
I'm going to choose D, 24 hours gives enough time to address any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
27 days ago
I agree with you, C) 240 minutes seems like a reasonable timeframe for those activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) 120 minutes, gives a bit more time to catch any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
1 months ago
I think I'll go with B, 120 minutes seems like a reasonable timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
1 months ago
I think I'll go with A) 60 minutes, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
2 months ago
This question is like a game of Tetris - you gotta move those activities fast before the queue gets too full! I'm picking 60 minutes, let's keep things tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Melda
5 days ago
I'm with you, let's go with 60 minutes to keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
12 days ago
Yeah, we need to keep the queue clear, 240 minutes is too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
16 days ago
I think 120 minutes might be too long to wait.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
1 months ago
I agree, 60 minutes sounds like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's better to have a shorter time to avoid delays in handling exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 months ago
24 hours? Are they trying to test our patience? I don't know about you, but I don't want my system drowning in exceptions. I'm going with A.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
1 months ago
I think A) 60 minutes is a better option to prevent the system from getting overwhelmed with unhandled activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
2 months ago
I agree, 24 hours seems like a long time to wait for exceptions to be moved to the queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delfina
2 months ago
I believe it's 120 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 months ago
Hmm, 120 minutes seems like a reasonable buffer, but 240 minutes? That's a long time to let those activities just sit there. I'm going to go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
2 months ago
Wait, what? Aliases without workflows? Sounds like a recipe for disaster! I'm going with 60 minutes, let's nip that exception queue in the bud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 months ago
I think it's 60 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77