Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-430 Topic 6 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-430 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 6
[All 500-430 Questions]

What are two valid reasons for using the REST API to retrieve health rule violations? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To add a custom extension to a Machine Agent, you need at least three artifacts: a directory, a jar or script file, and a monitor.xml file12. The directory is where you place your extension files under the <machine_agent_home>/monitors directory. The jar or script file is the executable file that collects and reports the custom metrics to the Machine Agent. The monitor.xml file is the configuration file that defines the name, frequency, and parameters of your extension.You can also optionally include other files such as libraries, configuration files, or templates for your extension12.Reference:Build a Monitoring Extension Using Scripts,Extensions and Custom Metrics


by Mozell at Feb 07, 2025, 04:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gretchen
1 months ago
Okay, let me see here... B and E seem to be the most relevant options. I'm a little unsure about C, but I don't think searching for historical events is a reason to use the REST API for health rule violations.
upvoted 0 times
Jackie
3 days ago
Yeah, C doesn't really fit the criteria for using the REST API in this case. It's more about actions and event management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
5 days ago
I agree, those two options seem to be the most valid reasons for retrieving health rule violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 months ago
I think B and E are the correct options. They make sense for using the REST API.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brinda
2 months ago
Haha, 'sending emails' as a reason for using the REST API? That's a good one! I'm pretty sure that's not the intended use case. I'm going with B and E as the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
Jeffrey
7 days ago
E) When pushing events to the Event Management System is NOT possible
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
11 days ago
B) For determining which actions have been executed
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 months ago
A) For updating an AppDynamics dashboard
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nancey
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I would have thought option A, updating an AppDynamics dashboard, would be a valid reason too. Hmm, let me think this through again.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
1 months ago
E) When pushing events to the Event Management System is NOT possible
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 months ago
A) For updating an AppDynamics dashboard
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colton
2 months ago
I disagree. I think B) for determining actions executed and D) for sending emails are also valid reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
2 months ago
I think options B and E are the valid reasons for using the REST API to retrieve health rule violations. B covers determining which actions have been executed, and E is for when pushing events to the Event Management System is not possible.
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
1 months ago
That makes sense. So those are the two valid reasons for using the REST API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 months ago
And option E is for when pushing events to the Event Management System is not possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
1 months ago
Yes, option B is for determining which actions have been executed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 months ago
I think options B and E are the valid reasons for using the REST API to retrieve health rule violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
2 months ago
I agree with Yvette. A) for updating dashboard and E) when pushing events is not possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
2 months ago
I think A) and E) are valid reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77