Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-425 Topic 2 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-425 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 2
[All 500-425 Questions]

The customer has several Business Transactions which take significant time to execute. These transactions are continuously reported as being Slow or Stalled transactions An SLA has been established for these transactions How does the engineer set static thresholds for these Business Transactions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the Troubleshoot Health Rule Violations document1, one of the ways to troubleshoot health rule violations is to click on the Events tab for the application on the Default Flow Map and then analyze the health rule(s) being violated. This will show you the details of the health rule violation events, such as the affected entity, the severity, the duration, the evaluation time, and the triggered actions. You can also drill down into the health rule violation details to see the health rule configuration, the metric values, and the snapshots. This will help you identify the root cause of the issue and take appropriate remediation actions. Therefore, the correct answer is D. Using the metric browser, disabling the health rule, or rebooting the server may not be the best or the most efficient ways to troubleshoot health rule violations, as they may not reveal the source of the problem, may affect other entities, or may not resolve the issue permanently.Reference:

Troubleshoot Health Rule Violations


by Asha at Jan 23, 2025, 05:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Donte
2 months ago
I bet the engineer is tempted to just set the thresholds to 'infinity' to avoid any slow or stalled transactions! But C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Adolph
9 days ago
Adolph: Yeah, setting default thresholds might not be the best approach in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
18 days ago
Vanesa: That sounds like a good plan. It's important to keep track of those specific transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
1 months ago
Engineer: I think I'll go with option C and set individual thresholds for the long-running transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marvel
2 months ago
D is an interesting option, but it doesn't really address the root issue. I'll go with C as well.
upvoted 0 times
Shannan
18 days ago
I think C is the most practical option to address the slow or stalled transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
1 months ago
I agree, setting individual thresholds for long-running transactions seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
1 months ago
Yeah, adjusting the Health Rules might not solve the problem. Setting specific thresholds for those transactions is more targeted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
I agree, setting individual thresholds for long-running transactions seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
2 months ago
B seems wrong. There has to be a way to adjust the thresholds for specific transactions. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. We can set individual transaction thresholds for the slow-running business transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
I agree with Huey, setting static thresholds for the Business Transactions seems like the best approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe adjusting the Health Rules so these long-running transactions are not considered slow or stalled would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
I think the engineer should select Individual Transaction Thresholds and set the thresholds for the long-running transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77