Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-420 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-420 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All 500-420 Questions]

Refer to exihibit.

Refer to the exhibit. When looking at the Transaction Score for a specific transaction, how are errors in the transaction identified?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Errors in a transaction are identified by examining the snapshots that capture the problematic transactions. By setting the appropriate time range, a Performance Analyst can drill down into the snapshots within the Error tab to identify and analyze errors. These snapshots provide detailed diagnostic information, such as stack traces, slow SQL queries, and error logs, which are vital for pinpointing the root cause of transaction errors.


AppDynamics documentation on Transaction Snapshots:

Contribute your Thoughts:

Micheline
10 months ago
That's a good point, Brent. It's important to consider all options before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
11 months ago
I think B might be the answer, examining the Slow Response Times tab can also help identify errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
11 months ago
I agree with Micheline, A seems like the right choice with the Error tab.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
11 months ago
I believe the correct answer is D, as drilling down into snapshots in the Events tab can help identify errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C, because the dashboard should show errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
11 months ago
I think the answer is A, because you can drill down into snapshots in the Error tab.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
12 months ago
I see your point, Coletta. But I still think option A is the most direct way to identify errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
12 months ago
But what about option C? Examining the dashboard for errors could also be a valid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
1 years ago
I agree with Shaniqua, we need to drill down into the snapshots in the Error tab.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
1 years ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 years ago
Haha, yeah, slow response times could just mean the transaction was a little sluggish, but not necessarily problematic. Although, I guess you could argue that's a form of error too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 years ago
True, but that might be a bit more time-consuming than just checking the dashboard. And option B talks about examining slow response times, which might not necessarily indicate an error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
1 years ago
Hmm, I think I'm leaning towards option C as the most straightforward answer. The dashboard seems like the best place to quickly identify any errors.
upvoted 0 times
Eladia
1 years ago
Definitely, it's a good practice to check the dashboard first for any immediate issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
1 years ago
Agreed, the dashboard is usually designed to provide a clear overview.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
1 years ago
Yeah, option C does sound like the best choice for quickly spotting errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 years ago
D) Set the time range and drill down into the snapshots in the Events tab.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
1 years ago
C) Set the time range and examine the dashboard for errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 years ago
B) Set the time range and examine the Slow Response Times tab.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
1 years ago
A) Set the time range and drill down into the snapshots in the Error tab.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
1 years ago
Agreed. Let's go with C and hope we got it right!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77