Cisco Exam 500-420 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-420 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 1

An E-commerce application is built using microservices architecture design with several components. In AppDynamics, how should the Transaction Detection rules be grouped logically?

AUse Automatic Discovery

BUse Scope

CUse Transaction Group

DUse Backend Detection

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

The Metric Explorer in AppDynamics allows Performance Analysts to define and visualize Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) from a selection of metrics. By accessing the Transaction Analytics data set, analysts can create custom dashboards that focus on the metrics they've determined to be critical KPIs for their application's performance.

AppDynamics documentation on Metric Explorer:

by Reuben at May 18, 2024, 04:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Donte

2 months ago

I'm so hungry, I could eat a whole microservice right now. But first, I need to figure out this Transaction Group thing.

upvoted 0 times

Miss

10 days ago

Let's make sure to set it up correctly in AppDynamics for better monitoring and troubleshooting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicky

19 days ago

I agree, it helps organize and manage the rules more effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

1 months ago

I think we should use Transaction Group to logically group the Transaction Detection rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmer

2 months ago

Use Scope? Really? That's about as useful as a chocolate teapot in this scenario. Transaction Group is the clear winner.

upvoted 0 times

Jenelle

10 days ago

I think Automatic Discovery could also be useful in certain situations, but Transaction Group is definitely the most logical choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

17 days ago

I agree, Scope seems pretty limited in this case. Transaction Group provides a more comprehensive approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

1 months ago

Transaction Group is definitely the way to go. It helps organize everything better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

2 months ago

Backend Detection seems like a good choice, but I'm worried it might not provide the level of granularity I need for my microservices. Transaction Group is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Catherin

17 days ago

Automatic Discovery could be useful for detecting new components in the microservices architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Telma

1 months ago

Using Scope might also be helpful in organizing the rules effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

1 months ago

I agree, Transaction Group provides the level of granularity needed for microservices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lazaro

2 months ago

I think Transaction Group is the best option for grouping Transaction Detection rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

2 months ago

Automatic Discovery sounds like a convenient option, but I'm not sure if it will accurately capture the complexity of the microservices setup. I think I'll go with Transaction Group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nell

2 months ago

The Transaction Detection rules should be grouped using Transaction Group. This is the most logical approach to organize the rules based on the microservices architecture.

upvoted 0 times