Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 5 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 5
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which two actions are required to optimize load balancing asymmetrically with a 4:1 ratio between links? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Stephaine
1 months ago
I'm going with B and E. Seems like the most logical way to achieve the 4:1 load-balancing ratio between the links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
1 months ago
Haha, D is a funny one. Setting the cellular uplink speed to zero? That's a bold move, but I don't think it's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
14 days ago
Yeah, setting the cellular uplink speed to zero does seem like a bold move, but I agree that it's probably not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
17 days ago
E) Change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 so that the ratio is 4:1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
21 days ago
A) Change the primary uplink to 'none.'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
2 months ago
B and E seem like the correct answers. Defining the load-balancing ratio and setting the speeds accordingly makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Vivan
3 days ago
Changing the primary uplink to 'none' doesn't seem relevant for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 days ago
Enabling load balancing is also necessary for optimizing the load balancing asymmetrically.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
6 days ago
I agree, setting the speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to a 4:1 ratio is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
9 days ago
Setting the speed of the cellular uplink to zero would help achieve the desired load balancing ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
16 days ago
Enabling load balancing is also important for optimizing the 4:1 ratio between links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
21 days ago
Changing the primary uplink to 'none' and setting the speed ratio would optimize load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
1 months ago
I agree, B and E are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
2 months ago
I'm not sure about changing the primary uplink to 'none'. I think focusing on adjusting the speeds and enabling load balancing is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
2 months ago
I agree with Louann. That, along with enabling load balancing, should help achieve the 4:1 ratio between links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
2 months ago
I think we need to change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to optimize load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
2 months ago
Hmm, I think E is the way to go. Adjusting the assigned speeds to a 4:1 ratio should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Yong
29 days ago
Let's make sure to change the speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
1 months ago
We should also enable load balancing to optimize it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 months ago
I agree, adjusting the speeds should help with the load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 months ago
E sounds like a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregg
2 months ago
But do we also need to enable load balancing for it to work properly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
3 months ago
I agree with you, Viola. That would help achieve the 4:1 ratio between links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
I think we need to change the assigned speeds of WAN 1 and WAN 2 to optimize load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77