Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Assuming this MX has established a full tunnel with its VPN peer, how will the MX route the WebEx traffic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hoa
30 days ago
I bet the correct answer involves some kind of hidden camera or secret tunnel. This networking stuff is like a spy thriller!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
1 months ago
Wait, what if the WebEx traffic is sentient and decides to take a scenic route through both WANs? That would be a plot twist!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 months ago
Option A is interesting, but I'm not sure how the 'Conf' performance class thresholds would factor into the routing decision for WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
8 days ago
User 2: WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 2 as long as it meets the thresholds in the ''Conf'' performance class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
12 days ago
User 1: Option A is interesting, but I'm not sure how the 'Conf' performance class thresholds would factor into the routing decision for WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clorinda
1 months ago
Hmm, Option B doesn't sound right to me. Just because WAN 1 is the primary uplink doesn't mean it should always be the preferred path for WebEx.
upvoted 0 times
Elza
7 days ago
D) WebEx traffic will be load-balanced between both active WAN links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
10 days ago
C) WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 2 as long as it is up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
16 days ago
A) WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 2 as long as it meets the thresholds in the ''Conf'' performance class.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Macy
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. As long as WAN 2 is up, it should be the preferred path for WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Gene
6 days ago
Yes, Option C seems like the correct choice for routing WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 days ago
I agree, as long as WAN 2 is up, it should route the WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
15 days ago
I think Option C makes sense. WAN 2 should be the preferred path for WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice here. Load-balancing WebEx traffic across both active WAN links ensures efficient use of network resources.
upvoted 0 times
Stephanie
17 days ago
Got it, so option B would be the failover solution for WebEx traffic if WAN 2 goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
19 days ago
In that case, the MX would route the WebEx traffic through WAN 1 as it is the primary uplink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
30 days ago
But what if WAN 2 goes down? Wouldn't it be better to prioritize WAN 1 for WebEx traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
1 months ago
I agree, option D makes sense. Load-balancing will prevent congestion on a single link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 months ago
But what if WAN 2 goes down, wouldn't it affect the WebEx traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
2 months ago
I agree, option D makes sense for load-balancing WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eden
2 months ago
But what if WAN 1 is congested? Wouldn't it make sense for the MX to route the traffic through WAN 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 1 as it is the primary uplink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 2 as long as it meets the thresholds in the ''Conf'' performance class.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77