Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 3
[All 400-007 Questions]

Company XYZ Is running a redundant private WAN network using OSPF as the underlay protocol The current design accommodates for redundancy In the network, but it Is taking over 30 seconds for the network to reconverge upon failure Which technique can be Implemented In the design to detect such a failure in a subsecond?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Amber at Apr 06, 2025, 10:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Silvana
26 days ago
Gotta love it when the perfect solution is just a simple protocol like BFD. D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
28 days ago
Haha, I bet the network admin wishes they had implemented BFD from the start! D is definitely the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
1 months ago
Hmm, I was debating between C and D, but I think D. BFD is the way to go. It's purpose-built for rapid failure detection, which is exactly what they need here.
upvoted 0 times
Lore
11 days ago
User 3: Agreed, BFD is the best option for subsecond failure detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, BFD is designed for rapid failure detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
16 days ago
User 1: I think D. BFD is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
1 months ago
I'm going with D as well. BFD is the perfect solution for this scenario - it can detect failures much faster than OSPF's normal operation.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvie
4 days ago
B) fate sharing
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
22 days ago
A) STP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think OSPF LFA could also be a good option for faster convergence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I agree with Olen, BFD can help detect failures quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 months ago
D. BFD sounds right to me. It's a great way to get that sub-second failure detection without having to rely on the slower OSPF convergence process.
upvoted 0 times
Odette
24 days ago
User 4: BFD seems like the most efficient choice for quick failure detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
30 days ago
User 3: I agree, BFD is much faster than waiting for OSPF to reconverge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, BFD is definitely the best option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
2 months ago
User 1: I think BFD is the way to go for sub-second failure detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olen
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) BFD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
2 months ago
I think the answer is D. BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) is a protocol designed specifically for quick failure detection, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
26 days ago
Yes, BFD is the way to go for fast network convergence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 months ago
I agree, BFD is the best option for subsecond failure detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77