Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 2 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam

Question #: 25
Topic #: 2

Company XYZ is designing the IS-IS deployment strategy for their multiarea IS-IS domain. They want IS-IS neighbour relationships to be minimized on each network segment and want to optimize the size of the IS-IS LSDB on each router. Which can design can be used to meet these requirements?

ADesign all routers as Level 2 routers. Set the links between the routers as Level 1 with the area

BDesign the network so that the routers connecting to other areas are Level 2 routers and internal routers are Level 1

CDesign the network so that all routers are Level 1 routers

DDesign the network so that the routers connecting to other areas are Level 1/Level 2 routers and internal routers are Level 1

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Kiley at Aug 07, 2023, 08:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lashaunda

1 months ago

I'm going with Option B, but I have to say, the thought of designing a network with all Level 1 routers sounds like a recipe for a giant, tangled mess. Not my cup of tea!

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

1 months ago

Option B all the way! It's the only one that really addresses the requirements. The other options seem like they'd just create more headaches.

upvoted 0 times

Luisa

9 days ago

Definitely, option B is the most efficient way to meet the requirements. It's all about optimizing the network structure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

21 days ago

Yeah, option B makes the most sense in this scenario. It's important to design the network carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephen

23 days ago

I agree, option B seems like the best choice for minimizing neighbor relationships and optimizing LSDB size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alberta

2 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards Option B, but I can't help but wonder if there's a catch. These certification exams love to trick you!

upvoted 0 times

Mose

14 days ago

User1: Exactly, and it could optimize the LSDB size on each router. Let's go with Option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bo

17 days ago

User2: Yeah, that could help minimize the number of neighbor relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bo

1 months ago

User1: Yeah, let's go with Option B and hope there are no tricky twists in the exam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominic

1 months ago

User1: I think Option B makes sense. It separates the routers based on their connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

1 months ago

User2: I agree, it seems like the most efficient design for minimizing IS-IS neighbor relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beula

1 months ago

User1: I think Option B is the way to go. It makes sense to have Level 2 routers connecting to other areas.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

2 months ago

I'm not sure, this question is a bit tricky. Option D looks interesting, but I'll have to think it through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlee

2 months ago

Option B seems like the way to go. Minimizing neighbor relationships and optimizing the LSDB size is key, and separating the Level 2 and Level 1 routers sounds like the perfect solution.

upvoted 0 times

Rossana

12 hours ago

By separating the routers connecting to other areas as Level 2 and internal routers as Level 1, they can achieve their goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

3 days ago

I agree, option B seems like the best choice for Company XYZ's IS-IS deployment strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

5 days ago

That makes sense, so option B is the best choice for Company XYZ's IS-IS deployment strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brent

7 days ago

True, but having Level 2 routers for connections to other areas can help optimize the LSDB size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

12 days ago

But wouldn't having all routers as Level 1 routers also minimize neighbor relationships?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

1 months ago

I agree, separating the routers like that would definitely help achieve the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

3 months ago

I prefer option D, having a mix of Level 1/Level 2 routers provides flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

3 months ago

I agree with Elvera, having Level 2 routers connecting to other areas makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvera

3 months ago

I think option B is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...