Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 5 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 5
[All 350-901 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer developed an Ansible playbook and committed it to GitLab. A GitLab CI pipeline is started but immediately fails. What is the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Frank
26 days ago
Come on, it's gotta be the runner task! That's the easiest thing to mess up. I can just picture the engineer typing the wrong parameter and then facepalming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
27 days ago
My money's on the undefined variable. Ansible can be picky about that, and it's an easy mistake to make when you're working across multiple files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
28 days ago
Haha, the runner running the wrong Docker version? That's a classic. I've seen that trip up so many people, they forget to check the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
29 days ago
Ah, the dreaded formatting issue! I bet that's it. Those Ansible playbooks can be finicky with the whitespace and indentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
1 months ago
The runner task using an incorrect parameter seems like the most likely issue here. I've seen that happen before when the playbook was working fine locally but failed in the CI pipeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
2 months ago
I believe the problem could be with the runner task using an incorrect parameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
I agree with Sol, there could be a formatting issue in the playbook.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
2 months ago
I think the issue might be with the Ansible playbook task.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77