Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 14 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam

Question #: 64
Topic #: 14

[All 350-901 Questions]

An organization manages a large cloud-deployed application that employs a microservices architecture across multiple data centers. Reports have received about application slowness. The container orchestration logs show that faults have been raised in a variety of containers that caused them to fail and then spin up brand new instances.

Which two actions can improve the design of the application to identify the faults? (Choose two.)

AAutomatically pull out the container that fails the most over a time period.

BImplement a tagging methodology that follows the application execution from service to service.

CAdd logging on exception and provide immediate notification.

DDo a write to the datastore every time there is an application failure.

EImplement an SNMP logging system with alerts in case a network link is slow.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Vi at Dec 27, 2023, 12:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-901 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lashaunda

12 days ago

I believe options C and B are both crucial for improving fault identification in the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

13 days ago

I agree with Vivan. Option B can also help track faults across services.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

15 days ago

I think option C is important for immediate notification of exceptions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

17 days ago

I believe implementing both options C and B would greatly improve fault identification in the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

21 days ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that 'pull out the container' option. Sounds like a recipe for more problems to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Una

23 days ago

Whoa, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm definitely going to need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Una

23 days ago

I agree with you, Tayna. Option B can also help in tracking faults across services.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

29 days ago

I think option C is important for identifying faults quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77