Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 1 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 1
[All 350-901 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The virtual next-generation firewalls running in the public cloud must be scaled out to meet the throughput requirements of the application layer. Which component is deployed to location A in the diagram?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elroy
1 months ago
Wait, is the public cloud just a giant hamster wheel powering the whole system? Gotta keep those firewalls running!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
1 months ago
I wonder if they have a virtual next-gen clown car firewall to handle all the traffic. That would be a real circus!
upvoted 0 times
Kina
2 days ago
User2: I agree, the internal load balancer helps distribute traffic efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 days ago
User1: I think the component deployed to location A is the internal load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
1 months ago
A frontend caching server? Really? That's just silly. This is clearly an infrastructure question, not a software one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 months ago
Nah, I don't think it's the backend database. That wouldn't make much sense in this scenario. I'm sticking with D.
upvoted 0 times
Annette
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, I'm going with D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 months ago
User 2: I think it might be the internal load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, I don't think it's the backend database either.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rupert
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. What if it's a forward proxy to handle the traffic? Seems like a logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jaleesa
9 days ago
User 3: Maybe it could be an internal load balancer to distribute the traffic efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
12 days ago
User 2: I'm not so sure about that. What if it's a forward proxy to handle the traffic? Seems like a logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
1 months ago
User 1: I think it might be a frontend caching server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kip
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it could also be the frontend caching server, as it can help improve performance by storing frequently accessed data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
I agree with Heike. The internal load balancer helps distribute incoming network traffic across multiple servers to ensure efficient use of resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 months ago
I think the component deployed to location A is the internal load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it could also be the frontend caching server to improve performance for the application layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is D. An internal load balancer would be the component deployed to location A to scale out the virtual next-gen firewalls and handle the throughput requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Maryrose
1 months ago
Definitely, an internal load balancer is crucial for handling the throughput requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
I think D) internal load balancer is the right choice for scaling out the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
2 months ago
Yes, an internal load balancer would help distribute traffic efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
I agree, D) internal load balancer makes sense for location A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
3 months ago
I agree with Lacey. The internal load balancer would help distribute the traffic efficiently to the virtual next-generation firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
3 months ago
I think the component deployed to location A is the internal load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77