Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-701 Topic 2 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-701 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 2
[All 350-701 Questions]

Which configuration method provides the options to prevent physical and virtual endpoint devices that are in the same base EPG or uSeg from being able to communicate with each other with Vmware VDS or Microsoft vSwitch?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Intra-EPG Isolationis an option to prevent physical or virtual endpoint devices that are in the same base EPG or microsegmented (uSeg) EPG from communicating with each other. By default, endpoint devices included in the same EPG are allowed to communicate with one another.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Corrinne
19 hours ago
A) inter-EPG isolation? What is this, a free-for-all? You gotta keep those endpoints in check, and C) intra-EPG isolation is the way to do it. It's like building a virtual fence around your virtual pets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
4 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) intra-EPG isolation could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 days ago
B) inter-VLAN security? Really? That's like trying to keep the cat out of the bird cage by locking the front door. C) intra-EPG isolation is the way to go, hands down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
12 days ago
C) intra-EPG isolation, of course! How else are you going to keep those pesky virtual endpoints from talking to each other? It's like putting your siblings in separate rooms to avoid a fight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
14 days ago
I agree with Melvin, because inter-EPG isolation prevents communication between devices in the same base EPG.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
17 days ago
D) placement in separate EPGs sounds like the right approach to me. Isolating devices in different EPGs is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
3 days ago
Yes, placing them in separate EPGs is the best way to prevent communication between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melvin
30 days ago
I think the answer is A) inter-EPG isolation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C) intra-EPG isolation. It makes the most sense to prevent communication within the same EPG.
upvoted 0 times
Chara
7 days ago
Absolutely, it helps to control the flow of traffic and prevent any unauthorized communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
8 days ago
That's good to know. It's important to have that level of isolation to enhance security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
12 days ago
Yes, you are correct. Intra-EPG isolation is the method to prevent communication within the same EPG.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77