Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-601 Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-601 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 2
[All 350-601 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer is implementing a configuration checkpoint on a Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The configuration must skip any existing vPC configuration errors and must complete if there are any configuration errors. The engineer finished the vPC domain configuration part. Which command completes the checkpoint implementation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Maybelle
1 months ago
Hey, at least the exhibit isn't a picture of a broken Cisco switch. That would really 'checkpoint' your day, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 months ago
Option D, 'verbose', could be useful for troubleshooting, but it doesn't seem to address the requirement of completing the checkpoint despite configuration errors. I'll have to pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A, 'stop-at-first-failure'. Why risk continuing with errors when you can just stop and fix them right away?
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
7 days ago
I'm not sure, but option D, 'verbose', could provide more detailed information to troubleshoot any errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
12 days ago
I would go with option C, 'best-effort', to try and complete the configuration despite errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
13 days ago
I think option B, 'atomic', might be a better choice for ensuring consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
16 days ago
I agree with you, option A seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rossana
2 months ago
Option B, 'atomic', sounds promising. Wouldn't that guarantee the entire checkpoint is successful or fail completely? Seems like the most reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
Ashleigh
13 days ago
User 3: Definitely, 'atomic' would guarantee the entire checkpoint is successful or fail completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
19 days ago
User 2: I agree, 'atomic' seems like the most reliable choice for the configuration checkpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
22 days ago
User 1: I think 'atomic' is the best option for ensuring the checkpoint is successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shanice
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with option C. 'best-effort' seems like the safest bet to ensure the configuration checkpoint completes, even with any vPC errors.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
16 days ago
User3: I agree, 'best-effort' seems like the best choice for handling any vPC errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, that sounds like the safest option to complete the checkpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
2 months ago
User1: I think option C, 'best-effort', is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamra
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A) stop-at-first-failure is the best choice because it ensures the configuration stops at the first failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) best-effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) stop-at-first-failure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77