Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-501 Topic 3 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-501 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 3
[All 350-501 Questions]

Refer to the exihibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Routers R1 through R5 are being deployed within the core of a service provider running BGP The core supports distribution of VPNv4 routes using MPLS. R3 currently has multiple paths to reach R4. A network engineer must implement BGP attributes so that R3 can reach R4 via R1. Which action must the engineer take to meet the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To direct traffic from R3 to R4 via R1, the weight attribute on R3 can be set higher for the route through R1 compared to other routes. Weight is a Cisco-specific BGP attribute that determines the preferred path when multiple routes to the same destination exist. It is local to the router on which it is configured and not advertised to other BGP peers.


Implementing and Operating Cisco Service Provider Network Core Technologies (SPCOR) course materials.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Samira
27 days ago
Hey, at least it's not a Cisco IOS syntax question, right? I'm feeling good about A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
27 days ago
Haha, these BGP questions always make my head spin. I'm just going to guess and hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
28 days ago
I agree with Farrah, a longer AS path would be a more reliable way to ensure R3 reaches R4 via R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
29 days ago
I think Aracelis is right, configuring R5 to send the route with a longer AS path makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
29 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
Nichelle
12 hours ago
User2: I agree, B seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
6 days ago
User1: I think B is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juliana
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure C is the right answer. Messing with the AS path is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Cathrine
21 days ago
I agree, tweaking the AS path is a common practice in BGP to influence routing decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
23 days ago
Yeah, manipulating the AS path is a common way to control routing. Good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
26 days ago
I think C is the best option too. Changing the AS path should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glen
1 months ago
But wouldn't configuring R3 with a higher weight for the route to R4 through R1 ensure that it takes that path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 months ago
Option A seems like the way to go. Gotta love those BGP attributes!
upvoted 0 times
Carlton
24 days ago
User1: True, it's always good to weigh all our options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
28 days ago
User3: I'm not so sure, maybe we should consider the other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
1 months ago
User2: Agreed, BGP attributes can really help with routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 months ago
User1: I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Configure R5 to send the route from R4 to R1 using a longer AS path than the AS path that it receives from R1 or R2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure R3 so the route to R4 through R1 will have a higher weight than the route from R2 or R5.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77