Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-201 Topic 9 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 9
[All 350-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

IDS is producing an increased amount of false positive events about brute force attempts on the organization's mail server. How should the Snort rule be modified to improve performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Verda
4 days ago
Option B? Seriously? Making the rule case-sensitive? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
24 days ago
I'd go with Option C. Tracking the source IP seems like a more targeted approach than just blocking a list of internal IPs.
upvoted 0 times
Daryl
3 days ago
User2: I agree, tracking the source IP would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
11 days ago
User1: I think Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
25 days ago
Option D looks like the way to go. Tuning the count and seconds threshold could help filter out those pesky false positives without blocking legitimate traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
27 days ago
I believe setting the rule to track the source IP could also help in improving performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
29 days ago
I agree with Tatum, adjusting the threshold might reduce false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
1 months ago
I think we should tune the count and seconds threshold of the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77