Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 350-201 Topic 8 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 8
[All 350-201 Questions]

A company recently completed an internal audit and discovered that there is CSRF vulnerability in 20 of its hosted applications. Based on the audit, which recommendation should an engineer make for patching?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by France at Jan 15, 2025, 02:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Felix
1 months ago
Updating third-party software might be a good start, but it's not going to fix the specific CSRF issues in the company's applications. D is definitely the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
3 days ago
A: Identifying the business applications running on the assets is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
10 days ago
B: I agree, that seems like the most thorough approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
1 months ago
A: We should fix applications according to the risk scores.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fallon
2 months ago
Haha, I'm pretty sure the auditors wouldn't appreciate us trying to 'exploit' the vulnerability. Let's stick to the safe and responsible options.
upvoted 0 times
German
8 days ago
Haha, I'm pretty sure the auditors wouldn't appreciate us trying to 'exploit' the vulnerability. Let's stick to the safe and responsible options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
9 days ago
D) Fix applications according to the risk scores
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
14 days ago
B) Update software to patch third-party software
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
17 days ago
D) Fix applications according to the risk scores
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
23 days ago
B) Update software to patch third-party software
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
1 months ago
A) Identify the business applications running on the assets
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 months ago
A) Identify the business applications running on the assets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
2 months ago
I'm not sure Metasploit is the best tool for validating CSRF. That seems a bit risky, especially in a production environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Patching the applications based on risk scores is the most effective approach to addressing the CSRF vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 months ago
But shouldn't we also identify the business applications running on the assets first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
I agree with Allene, it's important to prioritize based on risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
3 months ago
We should fix applications according to the risk scores.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77