Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-201 Topic 10 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 10
[All 350-201 Questions]

An organization is using a PKI management server and a SOAR platform to manage the certificate lifecycle. The SOAR platform queries a certificate management tool to check all endpoints for SSL certificates that have either expired or are nearing expiration. Engineers are struggling to manage problematic certificates outside of PKI management since deploying certificates and tracking them requires searching server owners manually. Which action will improve workflow automation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erinn
30 days ago
I bet the engineers are wishing they could just revoke all the problematic certificates and start over with a clean slate. Ah, the joys of PKI management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
1 months ago
I'm just hoping the server owners don't respond with a 'certificate, what certificate?' when they get those automated emails.
upvoted 0 times
Beatriz
7 days ago
A) Implement a new workflow within SOAR to create tickets in the incident response system, assign problematic certificate update requests to server owners, and register change requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Telma
1 months ago
Option D sounds like a good way to leverage Active Directory for server owner details. Automating email alerts for problematic certificates is a nice touch.
upvoted 0 times
Remedios
10 days ago
It would definitely streamline the process of requesting updates for certificates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
11 days ago
Automating email alerts for problematic certificates is a nice touch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
14 days ago
Option D sounds like a good way to leverage Active Directory for server owner details.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
2 months ago
That's a valid point, Dion. But I still think option A provides a more practical approach in assigning tasks and managing updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
2 months ago
Option C looks interesting, as it focuses on identifying assets outside the PKI zone and automating the update process. This could be a great way to catch those rogue certificates.
upvoted 0 times
Tracey
1 months ago
I agree, automating the identification and update process for certificates outside the PKI zone could really help with efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 months ago
Option C sounds like a good solution to streamline the certificate management process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dion
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient. Integrating a PKI solution within SOAR will centralize certificate management and monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I like the idea of integrating PKI within SOAR in option B. This way, we can manage the entire certificate lifecycle within a single platform, which could be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most comprehensive solution, as it covers the entire workflow from ticket creation to assignment and change management. This should definitely improve automation.
upvoted 0 times
Luther
1 months ago
Automating alerts for updates needed on certificates outside of the PKI zone could help ensure that no certificates are overlooked or forgotten.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 months ago
Integrating a PKI solution within SOAR could also be beneficial, as it would allow for better tracking and monitoring of certificates within the platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
1 months ago
I agree, creating tickets and assigning them to server owners will streamline the process of updating problematic certificates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most comprehensive solution, as it covers the entire workflow from ticket creation to assignment and change management. This should definitely improve automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It will streamline the process by assigning tasks to server owners and tracking change requests.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77