Cisco Exam 350-201 Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam

Question #: 103
Topic #: 1

[All 350-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Based on the detected vulnerabilities, what is the next recommended mitigation step?

AEvaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.

BPerform root cause analysis for all detected vulnerabilities.

CRemediate all vulnerabilities with descending CVSS score order.

DTemporarily shut down unnecessary services until patch deployment ends.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Domonique at Dec 11, 2024, 03:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mammie

4 months ago

Didn't they teach you in IT school to always read the fine print? The exhibit is clearly just a picture of a cat. I'm going with Option E: Adopt the cat and forget about the vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

Ira

3 months ago

Carlee: Definitely, we need to be strategic in our approach to mitigating vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlee

3 months ago

User 2: I agree, it's important to consider the impact before taking action.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricarda

3 months ago

User 1: I think we should evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvera

4 months ago

In my opinion, we should remediate all vulnerabilities with descending CVSS score order to address the most critical ones first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

4 months ago

Ah, the age-old question - do we go for the quick fix or the thorough analysis? I say, why not both? Multitasking is key!

upvoted 0 times

Micaela

4 months ago

C) Remediate all vulnerabilities with descending CVSS score order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

4 months ago

B) Perform root cause analysis for all detected vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

4 months ago

A) Evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vi

4 months ago

I believe we should also consider performing root cause analysis for all detected vulnerabilities to prevent future incidents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonie

4 months ago

I agree with Willetta, it's important to assess the impact before applying patches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

5 months ago

Option D sounds tempting, but temporarily shutting down services could cause more problems than it solves. Not a fan of that one.

upvoted 0 times

Merlyn

3 months ago

Let's focus on remediating vulnerabilities with the highest CVSS score first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

3 months ago

Root cause analysis is important to understand the vulnerabilities better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

3 months ago

I think we should prioritize patches based on risk before anything else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charolette

4 months ago

I agree, shutting down services could lead to more issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willetta

5 months ago

I think the next recommended mitigation step is to evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems like a safer bet - evaluating the service disruption risk first is prudent.

upvoted 0 times

Ena

4 months ago

User 1: I think option A is a good idea, we should evaluate the risk before prioritizing patches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

4 months ago

User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to consider the potential service disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lourdes

5 months ago

I think Option C is the best here. Remediating all vulnerabilities in descending CVSS order is the most comprehensive approach.

upvoted 0 times

Brandon

4 months ago

I see your point, but we should also consider temporarily shutting down unnecessary services for security reasons.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

5 months ago

That's a good point, but I still think remediating vulnerabilities in descending order is more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joana

5 months ago

But wouldn't it be better to evaluate service disruption first before prioritizing patches?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

5 months ago

I agree, Option C seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...