Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-915 Topic 14 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-915 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 14
[All 300-915 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

When a Docker image is built using this Dockerfile, which two statements are valid on Cisco IOx 1.8 and before? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorrine
10 months ago
I think it could be helpful, but I believe focusing on automated code reviews and team training is more critical for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
10 months ago
What do you think about the other options like B) Implement auto-provisioning security inspection for the code?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
10 months ago
That's a good point, Lorrine. It's important to continually test the system for security weaknesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
10 months ago
Performing on-going penetration testing on the system could also help in identifying and fixing security vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
10 months ago
I agree with Julieta, but I also think E) Train members of the team in a secure software development lifecycle methodology such as OWASP is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
11 months ago
I think A) Perform automated code reviews prior to deployment is really important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
11 months ago
That's a good point, Destiny. It's always good to have multiple security measures in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
12 months ago
I believe option B should also be considered. Implementing auto-provisioning security inspection can add an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
12 months ago
I agree with you, Carylon. Automated code reviews and training in secure development are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
1 years ago
I think option A and E are important for making the software development lifecycle more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 years ago
Haha, Lai makes a good point. 'Auto-provisioning security inspection' does sound like some buzzword-compliant nonsense. But hey, maybe the exam writers are trying to trip us up with that one. I'd stick with the tried-and-true methods - code reviews and OWASP training. Can't go wrong there.
upvoted 0 times
Weldon
1 years ago
E) Train members of the team in a secure software development lifecycle methodology such as OWASP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 years ago
A) Perform automated code reviews prior to deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
1 years ago
C) Perform on-going penetration testing on the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 years ago
E) Train members of the team in a secure software development lifecycle methodology such as OWASP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
1 years ago
A) Perform automated code reviews prior to deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lai
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about option B. 'Auto-provisioning security inspection' - what does that even mean? Sounds like some made-up consultant jargon to me. I'd much rather see a good old-fashioned code review, and make sure the team is trained on OWASP principles. Keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 years ago
I agree with Gayla. Automated code reviews and training the team on secure software development are so important. You can't just rely on penetration testing at the end - you need to build security in from the start. I also think option B, 'Implement auto-provisioning security inspection for the code,' is a good one. Catching security issues early in the pipeline is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
1 years ago
This is a great question that really gets at the heart of securing the software development lifecycle, especially for an IoT project where security is critical. I think the two best options here are A) Perform automated code reviews prior to deployment and E) Train members of the team in a secure software development lifecycle methodology such as OWASP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77