Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-910 Topic 2 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-910 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 2
[All 300-910 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The exhibit shows the output of an Ansible task that prints the contents of the

show_ip_int_brief variable that was registered in a different task in the playbook.

Which expression is used to print the output of the command without its header row?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The new version of the application is deployed to one of the environments, and then traffic is gradually shifted to the updated environment. This strategy allows the team to test the new version before releasing it to the public, ensuring that it is operating as expected. After the new version is tested and approved, traffic is fully shifted to the new environment and the old environment is shut down.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dortha
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go. It's like cutting the crusts off a sandwich - you don't need that extra stuff to get to the good stuff inside.
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
17 days ago
Using option B is like trimming the excess fat off the output, leaving only the essential information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
20 days ago
Option B makes it cleaner and easier to read the output without the unnecessary header row.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
1 months ago
I agree, option B is definitely the most efficient way to print the output without the header row.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queen
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Guess I'll have to flip a coin. Or maybe I should just ask Alexa for the answer - she always knows!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
Option D seems too easy. Why would the question mention 'without its header row' if the answer was just to print the entire stdout_lines?
upvoted 0 times
Kizzy
1 months ago
User2: I think so too. Option A looks like it might be the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
1 months ago
User1: Maybe the question is trying to trick us.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Honey
2 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Skipping the first character of the first line will also remove the header row. Looks like a clever solution.
upvoted 0 times
Elfriede
1 months ago
User2: Option C seems to be the most logical choice based on the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 months ago
User3: I'm not sure, but I think Option B could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
User2: I disagree, I believe Option C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
2 months ago
User1: I think Option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefany
2 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Printing the stdout_lines starting from index 1 will skip the header row and show the actual output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
3 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. That could be a valid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) show_ip_int_brief['stdout_lines'][0][1:]
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) show_ip_int_brief['stdout_lines'][0]
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77