Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-910 Topic 12 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-910 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 12
[All 300-910 Questions]

Which Dockerfile produces an efficient image rebuild when the exposed port Python dependency, or MyApp source code is modified?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leslie
1 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. It's like the Michael Jordan of Dockerfiles - efficient, streamlined, and sure to make your image game strong. Slam dunk that rebuild, my friend!
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
1 months ago
I'm going with Option A. It's the classic Dockerfile structure, and you can't go wrong with the classics! Plus, who doesn't love a good ol' `RUN apt-get update` command? It's like a warm hug for your Docker image.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
18 hours ago
User 3: Option A it is then. Classic structure for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
18 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Can't beat a good old `RUN apt-get update`.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
19 days ago
User 1: I think Option A is the way to go. Classic is always a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. They all look like they could work, but I'm leaning towards Option D. It seems the most straightforward and easy to understand. Sometimes simple is best, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
Option C seems like it would be the most efficient. By using the `COPY --from=builder` syntax, it can reuse the cached layers from the previous build, which should make the rebuild process much faster.
upvoted 0 times
Clarence
9 days ago
Definitely, Option C is the way to go for a quicker rebuild process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
28 days ago
I agree, Option C with the `COPY --from=builder` syntax seems like the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice. It allows for faster rebuilds by reusing cached layers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jordan
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option C might also be a good choice because it uses a cache layer for the Python dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
I think Option B looks the most efficient for rebuilding the image when the exposed port, Python dependency, or MyApp source code is modified. Separating the dependencies and app code into different layers makes it easier to cache and rebuild only the necessary parts.
upvoted 0 times
Eliz
1 months ago
https://www.practice4test.com/question_updater/json_images/300-910/OtherImage_5db3ababf-35fe-4732-8b0b-af20102be220.png
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
2 months ago
https://www.practice4test.com/question_updater/json_images/300-910/OtherImage_5db3ababf-35fe-4732-8b0b-af20102be220.png
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
2 months ago
I agree with Teresita. Option A is more efficient for image rebuilds when dependencies or source code are modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
3 months ago
I think Option A is the best choice because it uses a multi-stage build to separate the build environment from the runtime environment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77