Option B looks like the way to go. It's like the Michael Jordan of Dockerfiles - efficient, streamlined, and sure to make your image game strong. Slam dunk that rebuild, my friend!
I'm going with Option A. It's the classic Dockerfile structure, and you can't go wrong with the classics! Plus, who doesn't love a good ol' `RUN apt-get update` command? It's like a warm hug for your Docker image.
Hmm, I'm not sure. They all look like they could work, but I'm leaning towards Option D. It seems the most straightforward and easy to understand. Sometimes simple is best, you know?
Option C seems like it would be the most efficient. By using the `COPY --from=builder` syntax, it can reuse the cached layers from the previous build, which should make the rebuild process much faster.
I think Option B looks the most efficient for rebuilding the image when the exposed port, Python dependency, or MyApp source code is modified. Separating the dependencies and app code into different layers makes it easier to cache and rebuild only the necessary parts.
Leslie
1 months agoAsuncion
1 months agoNu
18 hours agoLizbeth
18 days agoJesusita
19 days agoMaile
1 months agoKattie
2 months agoClarence
9 days agoErnie
28 days agoArmando
1 months agoJordan
2 months agoHayley
2 months agoEliz
1 months agoMarnie
2 months agoAudry
2 months agoTeresita
3 months ago