Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-820 Topic 15 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-820 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 15
[All 300-820 Questions]

A Jabber user is being prompted to trust the Expressway-E certificate when using Mobile and Remote Access. The administrator has validated that the Expressway-E certificate is being trusted by the machine running the Jabber client.

What else can be done to solve this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Terrilyn
1 months ago
Wait, is this a Jabber user or a Jibber-jabber user? I'm getting mixed signals here. Either way, let's hope they trust the Expressway-E certificate, or else they'll be stuck in a Jibber-jabber loop!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 months ago
I wonder if the Expressway-E certificate was generated using a self-signed CA. If so, that could be the root of the problem. But yeah, option B seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Annett
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that could be the issue. Option B suggests including the Cisco Unified Communications Manager registration domain in the certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
18 days ago
User 1: Have you checked if the Expressway-E certificate was generated using a self-signed CA?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dyan
1 months ago
Creating a new CSR with updated SAN information could work, but it might be overkill. Option B looks like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
8 days ago
C: That should solve the issue. Let me know if it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
10 days ago
B: No, I haven't. I'll give that a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
15 days ago
A: Have you tried including the Cisco Unified Communications Manager registration domain in the Expressway-E certificate as a SAN?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Changing the domain name or the FQDN of the Expressway doesn't seem like the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
3 days ago
C) Change the domain name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
27 days ago
B) Include Cisco Unified Communications Manager registration domain in the Expressway-E certificate as a SAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 months ago
A) Create a new CSR with new information on the SAN field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oretha
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The Expressway-E certificate should include the Cisco Unified Communications Manager registration domain as a SAN to ensure proper trust verification.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
27 days ago
That makes sense, it's important for the certificate to have all the necessary information for proper trust verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
1 months ago
I agree, including the Cisco Unified Communications Manager registration domain as a SAN in the Expressway-E certificate should solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyra
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. I think creating a new CSR with new information on the SAN field (option A) might also work. It's worth considering all options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
3 months ago
I agree with Annette. Option B seems like the most logical choice. It's important to have all the necessary information in the certificate to ensure trust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
3 months ago
I think option B is the best solution. Including the Cisco Unified Communications Manager registration domain in the Expressway-E certificate as a SAN should help solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77