Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-815 Topic 7 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 7
[All 300-815 Questions]

An administrator troubleshoots call failure in a new deployment and finds that the SIP INVITE messages sent to the service provider contain a diversion header with the user's 4-digit directory number. These 4-digit directory numbers range from 1000 to 9999. The service provider is rejecting the calls because it requires that the diversion header contain 10 digits. Which command on the Cisco Unified Border Element resolves this issue for all users?

A)

B)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Micheal
2 days ago
Hmm, I think Option A is the way to go. Seems like the most straightforward solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
7 days ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option D, just to see what happens. You never know, it might be some secret Cisco hack!
upvoted 0 times
Demetra
10 hours ago
User 1: I think Option D might actually work, let's give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
13 days ago
Option B looks like the right choice here. It allows me to prepend the area code to the diversion header, which should satisfy the service provider's requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
22 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option B makes sense because it looks like it can modify the diversion header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
24 days ago
I agree with Velda, Option B seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
26 days ago
I think the answer is Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77