Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-815 Topic 7 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 7
[All 300-815 Questions]

An administrator troubleshoots call failure in a new deployment and finds that the SIP INVITE messages sent to the service provider contain a diversion header with the user's 4-digit directory number. These 4-digit directory numbers range from 1000 to 9999. The service provider is rejecting the calls because it requires that the diversion header contain 10 digits. Which command on the Cisco Unified Border Element resolves this issue for all users?

A)

B)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ashanti
1 months ago
Hold on, I'm just going to measure the length of each option to see which one has exactly 10 digits. Science never fails!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
1 months ago
Oh man, I'm so tired of these SIP header issues. Time to call the Cisco TAC and let them figure it out for me!
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
3 days ago
Option C
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
4 days ago
Option B
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
15 days ago
Option A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micheal
2 months ago
Hmm, I think Option A is the way to go. Seems like the most straightforward solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Nydia
1 months ago
User 3: I think Option A is the way to go as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, Option A seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option A looks like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lennie
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option D, just to see what happens. You never know, it might be some secret Cisco hack!
upvoted 0 times
Alecia
13 hours ago
Niesha: Let's try Option B then, can't hurt to explore all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
6 days ago
User 3: I'm not so sure about Option D, maybe we should consider Option B instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's worth a try. Can't hurt to experiment with different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
2 months ago
User 1: I think Option D might actually work, let's give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
2 months ago
Option B looks like the right choice here. It allows me to prepend the area code to the diversion header, which should satisfy the service provider's requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Charlesetta
1 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best solution in this scenario. It will ensure that the diversion header contains the necessary 10 digits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 months ago
Option B is indeed the correct choice. It will help you prepend the area code to the diversion header, meeting the service provider's requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rossana
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option B makes sense because it looks like it can modify the diversion header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
3 months ago
I agree with Velda, Option B seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
3 months ago
I think the answer is Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77