Cisco Exam 300-815 Topic 13 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam

Question #: 101
Topic #: 13

An engineer configures several calling party transformation patterns in Cisco UCM so that calling numbers are shown in the +E.164 format. The route patterns match seven-digit internal numbers and prefix the numbers with 1408. The SIP trunk matches 1408XXXXXXX and prefixes the number with +. When users make outbound calls, the calling number still shows as seven digits. What is the cause of this problem?

AThe calling transformation on the SIP trunk is applied first, and then the calling transformation on the route patterns is applied.

BCalling transformations cannot be configured on both route patterns and a SIP trunk.

CThe calling transformation on the route patterns is ignored because there is already a calling transformation on the SIP trunk.

DThe engineer must also apply a calling transformation at the route group details level.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Quentin at Oct 22, 2024, 05:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-815 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Denny

7 months ago

Well, this is a tricky one. I bet the engineer is scratching their head trying to figure out why the seven-digit numbers are still showing up. Maybe they should try turning it off and on again?

upvoted 0 times

Candida

6 months ago

The engineer might need to apply a calling transformation at the route group details level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

6 months ago

I think the calling transformation on the route patterns is being ignored.

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

6 months ago

Maybe the calling transformation on the SIP trunk is causing the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

7 months ago

Haha, looks like the engineer just forgot to use their crystal ball to foresee this problem. Can't blame them though, those things are pretty unreliable.

upvoted 0 times

Kina

6 months ago

Definitely! It's all about understanding how the configurations interact with each other.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curt

6 months ago

Oh, that makes sense. The order of operations is important in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

6 months ago

C) The calling transformation on the route patterns is ignored because there is already a calling transformation on the SIP trunk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashleigh

7 months ago

A) The calling transformation on the SIP trunk is applied first, and then the calling transformation on the route patterns is applied.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reid

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure the issue is with the calling transformations themselves. It might be that the engineer needs to apply a transformation at the route group level as well.

upvoted 0 times

Tegan

7 months ago

D) The engineer must also apply a calling transformation at the route group details level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

7 months ago

C) The calling transformation on the route patterns is ignored because there is already a calling transformation on the SIP trunk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

7 months ago

A) The calling transformation on the SIP trunk is applied first, and then the calling transformation on the route patterns is applied.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

8 months ago

I think the problem is that the calling transformation on the SIP trunk is being applied first, overriding the transformation on the route patterns. The order of operations is key here.

upvoted 0 times