Cisco Exam 300-815 Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam

Question #: 102
Topic #: 1

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Users report that outgoing calls do not work on the new SIP trunk for outgoing calls. The solution consists of a Cisco UCM Cluster linked to a Cisco Unified Border Element where the SIP trunk is terminated. The provider required 10 digits. The logs show a line going toward the Cisco Unified Border Element. Which code snippet must be added to the configuration to meet the requirement?

Arequest Invite sip-header modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the SIP translation profile configuration

Bsip-header modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the voice translation profile configuration

Crequest Invite sip-header Diversion modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the SIP profile configuration

Drequest Invite sip-header modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the voice translation profile configuration

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Maia at Nov 13, 2024, 07:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-815 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cecilia

7 months ago

Haha, Option C sounds like a classic case of 'Diversion' tactics! I'll steer clear of that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tu

7 months ago

I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice because it specifically mentions the SIP translation profile configuration which is relevant to the scenario described in the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

7 months ago

Option A seems like the way to go. It's a direct solution to the issue with the SIP trunk and the provider's requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Gail

6 months ago

User4: Sounds good, let's implement the code snippet in option A for the configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildegarde

6 months ago

User3: Let's go with option A then, it directly addresses the provider's requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

6 months ago

User2: I agree, modifying the SIP header in the translation profile should solve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rocco

7 months ago

User1: I think option A is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tu

7 months ago

I think the answer is A) request Invite sip-header modify <sip:1(...)@ <sip:9135551\\1@ under the SIP translation profile configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...