Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-810 Topic 1 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-810 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 1
[All 300-810 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. A collaboration engineer is troubleshooting an alarm that indicates that there are duplicate user IDs. Which two actions resolve this issue? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The scenario indicates a high availability failover condition for a Cisco IM and Presence server: one node is idle, the other is running in backup mode. To restore both nodes to normal operation, initiating a controlled failover is the best approach:

Failover Action:This will gracefully switch the active role to the idle node, making it primary and restoring redundancy.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Devon
2 days ago
I heard the collaboration engineer was so confused, they almost tried turning the system off and on again to fix the duplicate user issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
4 days ago
E) Unassigning a user from one of the clusters? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Not a fan of that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
5 days ago
Haha, assigning the duplicate user to the secondary node? D) sounds more like a band-aid than a real solution. I'd rather not juggle users between clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
6 days ago
Deleting the user ID? That's a bit extreme, isn't it? B) is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
8 days ago
A) and C) seem like the logical choices here. Renaming the user ID or directory URI should resolve the duplicate issue without losing the user's data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
19 days ago
I think we should also consider deleting the user ID for the duplicate user ID as another solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
22 days ago
I agree with Frederica, that could help resolve the duplicate user ID issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
25 days ago
I think we should rename the user ID value for one user.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77