Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 9 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 9
[All 300-720 Questions]

An organization wants to prevent proprietary patent documents from being shared externally via email. The network administrator reviewed the DLP policies on the Cisco Secure Email Gateway and could not find an existing policy with the appropriate matching patterns. Which type of DLP policy template must be used to create a policy that meets this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the [Cisco Secure Email User Guide], you can create a text resource of type Disclaimer Template and use the code view option to insert HTML code into the text box. Then, you can use this text resource in a content filter to prepend or append the HTML message to the email body[1, p. 15-16].

The other options are not valid because:

A) Creating a text resource type of Disclaimer Template and pasting the HTML code into the text box without changing to code view will not work, as the HTML code will be treated as plain text and not rendered properly[1, p. 15].

C) Creating a text resource type of Notification Template and pasting the HTML code into the text box will not work, as Notification Templates are used for sending notifications to senders or recipients, not for modifying the email body[1, p. 17].

D) Creating a text resource type of Notification Template and changing to code view to paste the HTML code into the text box will not work, as Notification Templates are used for sending notifications to senders or recipients, not for modifying the email body[1, p. 17].


Contribute your Thoughts:

Remedios
2 days ago
I bet the network admin is wishing they had a 'Prevent Leaks of Sensitive Documents' policy template. CusInes it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
4 days ago
Acceptable use? What, are we trying to police how people use their email? CusInes policy is clearly the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
5 days ago
Regulatory compliance? Sounds like overkill for this situation. CusInes policy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
18 days ago
Privacy protection? Nah, that's not specific enough. Definitely need a cusInes policy here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
20 days ago
Hmm, this seems like a custom policy would be the way to go. Gotta get those patent docs locked down tight!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
21 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) custom policy could also be a valid option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
22 days ago
I agree with Tiara, because we need to prevent sharing of proprietary documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
29 days ago
I think the answer is A) privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77