Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 5 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 5
[All 300-720 Questions]

Which global setting is configured under Cisco ESA Scan Behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Noe
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Maybe I should just go with the answer that sounds the most technical - D, the minimum depth of attachment recursion to scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 months ago
Haha, this question is making me hungry. I'm going to say A, the minimum attachment size to scan. Got to make sure those big attachments don't slip through!
upvoted 0 times
Frank
7 days ago
I'm sticking with A, the minimum attachment size to scan. Gotta catch those big files!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
14 days ago
I agree with you, I think it's B as well. We need to set a timeout for scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
16 days ago
Hmm, I'm going with B, attachment scanning timeout. Can't let those attachments take too long to scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
19 days ago
I think it's actually D, the minimum depth of attachment recursion to scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerrie
1 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'd go with B. The attachment scanning timeout seems like a crucial global setting to have control over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'm leaning towards C. The actions for unscannable messages due to attachment type seems like a logical global setting to configure.
upvoted 0 times
Carmela
13 days ago
I think C is the right choice. It makes sense to configure actions for unscannable messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yan
2 months ago
Hmm, I think it's D. The depth of attachment recursion seems like a global setting that would be configured in the Cisco ESA Scan Behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Murray
19 days ago
I agree with you, D does seem like a global setting that would be configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
23 days ago
I believe it's C, the actions for unscannable messages due to attachment type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 months ago
I think it's actually A, the minimum attachment size to scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentine
2 months ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to prioritize scanning the depth of attachment recursion to ensure thorough inspection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) minimum attachment size to scan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) minimum depth of attachment recursion to scan.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77