Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 3 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 3
[All 300-720 Questions]

An engineer is tasked with reviewing mail logs to confirm that messages sent from domain abc.com are passing SPF verification and being accepted by the Cisco ES

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the [Cisco Secure Email User Guide], you can create a text resource of type Disclaimer Template and use the code view option to insert HTML code into the text box. Then, you can use this text resource in a content filter to prepend or append the HTML message to the email body[1, p. 15-16].

The other options are not valid because:

A) Creating a text resource type of Disclaimer Template and pasting the HTML code into the text box without changing to code view will not work, as the HTML code will be treated as plain text and not rendered properly[1, p. 15].

C) Creating a text resource type of Notification Template and pasting the HTML code into the text box will not work, as Notification Templates are used for sending notifications to senders or recipients, not for modifying the email body[1, p. 17].

D) Creating a text resource type of Notification Template and changing to code view to paste the HTML code into the text box will not work, as Notification Templates are used for sending notifications to senders or recipients, not for modifying the email body[1, p. 17].


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ty
2 months ago
I bet the engineer's just been too busy playing Solitaire on their computer to notice the SPF issues. Tech support these days, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
25 days ago
C) The SPF conformance level is set to SIDF compatible on the Mail Flow Policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
1 months ago
B) SPF verification is disabled on the Mail Flow Policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
A) SPF verification is disabled in the Recipient Access Table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna have to go with Option C - maybe the engineers just really love SIDF and wanted to keep things 'compatible'... or they're just not paying attention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
2 months ago
I think it could also be because an SPF verification Content Filter has not been created. That might be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 months ago
Option D is the one that catches my eye. If there's no SPF verification Content Filter, how would the system even know to check for it?
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
1 months ago
We should definitely create an SPF verification Content Filter to ensure messages from domain abc.com are properly verified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
2 months ago
I think you're right, without the SPF verification Content Filter, the system wouldn't know to check for SPF.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawn
2 months ago
I'd go with Option A. The Recipient Access Table is where you'd configure SPF settings, so if it's disabled there, the verification won't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
I agree with Santos, that could be the reason. Maybe the engineer should check the Recipient Access Table settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I think the verification is not working because SPF verification is disabled in the Recipient Access Table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most likely culprit. If SPF verification is disabled on the Mail Flow Policy, that would explain why it's not being referenced in the logs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77