Cisco Exam 300-710 Topic 6 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam

Question #: 103
Topic #: 6

[All 300-710 Questions]

Which action must be taken to configure an isolated bridge group for IRB mode on a Cisco Secure Firewall device?

AAdd the restricted segment to the ACL.

BLeave BVI interface name empty.

CDefine the NAT pool for the blocked traffic.

DRemove the route from the routing table.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

To configure an isolated bridge group for Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) mode on a Cisco Secure Firewall device, the action to take is to leave the BVI (Bridge Virtual Interface) interface name empty. This ensures that the bridge group operates in an isolated manner, where Layer 3 routing is not applied to the bridged interfaces, effectively isolating the traffic within the bridge group.

Steps:

Access the firewall's configuration interface.

Configure the bridge group interfaces.

Ensure that the BVI interface name is left empty to isolate the bridge group.

This configuration prevents Layer 3 routing for the isolated bridge group, ensuring that traffic remains contained within the bridge group.

by Loren at Jan 09, 2025, 02:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-710 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lai

3 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I'm totally stumped, someone please help me before the exam starts!

upvoted 0 times

Kattie

1 months ago

Got it, thanks for the tip!

upvoted 0 times

...

Latrice

1 months ago

Don't worry, just remember to add the restricted segment to the ACL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jospeh

2 months ago

C) Define the NAT pool for the blocked traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

2 months ago

B) Leave BVI interface name empty.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

2 months ago

A) Add the restricted segment to the ACL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

3 months ago

I bet the correct answer is A. Adding the restricted segment to the ACL is the way to go, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

Lorrie

1 months ago

I still think A is the correct answer. Adding the restricted segment to the ACL just makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

1 months ago

Actually, I believe it's D. Removing the route from the routing table seems like the correct action to take.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

2 months ago

No, I'm pretty sure it's C. Defining the NAT pool for the blocked traffic makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yong

2 months ago

I think the answer is B. Leaving the BVI interface name empty sounds like the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margery

3 months ago

Haha, this question is a piece of cake. Obviously, the answer is D. Removing the route from the routing table, duh!

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliana

3 months ago

No way, the answer has to be B. Leaving the BVI interface name empty is the key to make it work, trust me!

upvoted 0 times

Sharen

3 months ago

I disagree, the correct answer is B. Leaving the BVI interface name empty is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karma

3 months ago

I think the answer is A. Adding the restricted segment to the ACL is necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carri

3 months ago

But wouldn't defining the NAT pool for the blocked traffic make more sense? That's option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quiana

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Leave BVI interface name empty.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carri

4 months ago

I think the answer is A) Add the restricted segment to the ACL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delfina

4 months ago

I think the answer is C. Defining the NAT pool for the blocked traffic seems like the logical step to configure an isolated bridge group for IRB mode.

upvoted 0 times