Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-630 Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-630 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 6
[All 300-630 Questions]

What is a design implication for Cisco ACI using an application-centric approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Using an application-centric approach in Cisco ACI means that multiple VLANs and/or multiple EPGs can be grouped under one bridge domain. This approach aligns network constructs with application requirements, enabling more efficient and flexible network configurations.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Serina
26 days ago
I'm going with option C. It seems more scalable to have one EPG mapped to multiple bridge domains, especially in complex networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Keeping the VLAN numbers in the object names makes it easier to keep track of everything.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
2 days ago
It's important to have a clear naming convention for better management of the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
13 days ago
I agree, having VLAN numbers in the names of the objects definitely helps with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sang
2 months ago
Ha! I bet the engineers at Cisco had a field day coming up with these fancy terms. 'EPG' and 'bridge domain' - sounds like they're playing a game of Scrabble.
upvoted 0 times
Laurene
15 days ago
C) One EPG is mapped to multiple bridge domains
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
17 days ago
B) VLAN numbers are in the names of the bridge domain and EPG objects
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 months ago
A) Multiple VLANs and/or multiple EPGs are under one bridge domain
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Serina
2 months ago
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective. I can see how that would simplify the design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is D) One VLAN equals one EPG equals one bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems more intuitive to me. Multiple VLANs and EPGs under one bridge domain seems like a more flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
Nakita
26 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Having everything under one bridge domain makes it easier to manage and scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the way to go. It allows for more flexibility with multiple VLANs and EPGs under one bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariann
2 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. It makes the most sense to have a one-to-one mapping between VLAN, EPG, and bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
2 months ago
I think the design implication is A) Multiple VLANs and/or multiple EPGs are under one bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77