Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 9 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 9
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer is troubleshooting the connectivity between Server-1 and Server-2. Which action resolves the connectivity issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erick
1 months ago
Wait, is this a Cisco exam? If so, I'm pretty sure the answer is always 'configure the Cisco recommended best practices'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the engineer is just trying to turn it off and on again. But seriously, I think C - classifying the CFS messages for strict priority queue on the spine switches is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 months ago
Oh, I got it! The answer has to be A - enabling the BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches. That should resolve the connectivity problem.
upvoted 0 times
Barney
2 days ago
Great! Let's go ahead and configure that to resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
14 days ago
I agree, that seems like the most logical solution to the connectivity issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
20 days ago
Yes, enabling the BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches should definitely help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashanti
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. The question mentions troubleshooting the connectivity, so I'm leaning towards D - changing all ports on the spine switches to port-type fabric.
upvoted 0 times
Linette
16 days ago
Classifying CFS messages for strict priority queue on spine switches could help with the connectivity issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 months ago
Configuring the same source IP address on NVE and virtual peer link on leaf switches could be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
1 months ago
I think enabling BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches might also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julio
2 months ago
Hmm, the connectivity issue seems to be related to the VXLAN configuration. I think the answer is B - configuring the same source IP address on the NVE and virtual peer link on the leaf switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I'll have to reconsider my choice then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D. Changing all ports on spine switches as port-type fabric seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
3 months ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring the same source IP address on NVE and virtual peer link makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77