Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 9 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 9
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The FCoE traffic fails to traverse the vfc2 interface. The VSAN 102 is configured for vfc2. Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Eun
6 months ago
Okay, let me put on my thinking cap. Hmm, I'd say D. Enabling LLDP on the neighbor switch sounds like the most logical solution. Unless, of course, the neighbor switch is a sentient being and doesn't want to be friends.
upvoted 0 times
Jolene
6 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It should help with the FCoE traffic issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
6 months ago
I think enabling LLDP on the neighbor switch is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dwight
6 months ago
Dude, I'm just here for the free snacks. But if I had to guess, I'd say D is the answer. Gotta keep those LLDP beacons shining bright, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Viola
5 months ago
User 4: Make sure those LLDP beacons are shining bright!
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
User 3: LLDP is important for FCoE traffic to traverse properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
6 months ago
User 2: Yeah, enabling LLDP on the neighbor switch should help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
6 months ago
User 1: I think D is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Truman
6 months ago
I believe enabling LLDP on the neighbor switch might also help in resolving the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
7 months ago
I agree with Esteban. Activating DCBX on the N9K switch should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
7 months ago
Ah, the age-old FCoE dilemma. I'd go with C, activate DCBX on the interface e101/1/2. That's the interface, right? I'm sure it'll work, or at least make the question more interesting.
upvoted 0 times
Albina
5 months ago
Let's give it a try and see if it resolves the issue with the FCoE traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
6 months ago
I agree, activating DCBX on the specific interface seems like the most direct fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
6 months ago
Yeah, that sounds like a good solution. It should help with the FCoE traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
6 months ago
I think activating DCBX on the interface e101/1/2 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renato
7 months ago
I think B is the way to go. Activating DCBX on the N9K switch should do the trick. It's all about that data center bridging, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
6 months ago
User 3: I think activating DCBX on the interface e101/1/2 might be worth a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
6 months ago
User 2: Maybe enabling LLDP on the neighbor switch could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
6 months ago
User 1: I agree, activating DCBX on the N9K switch sounds like the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Esteban
7 months ago
I think the issue can be resolved by activating DCBX on the N9K switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
7 months ago
The correct answer is D. Enabling LLDP on the neighbor switch will resolve the issue with the FCoE traffic not traversing the vfc2 interface. LLDP is crucial for proper FCoE communication.
upvoted 0 times
Rebecka
6 months ago
D) Enable LLDP on the neighbor switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
6 months ago
C) Activate DCBX on the interface e101/1/2
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
6 months ago
D) Enable LLDP on the neighbor switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
6 months ago
C) Activate DCBX on the interface e101/1/2
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
6 months ago
B) Activate DCBX on the N9K switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
6 months ago
B) Activate DCBX on the N9K switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
7 months ago
A) Enable LLDP on the interface vfc2
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
7 months ago
A) Enable LLDP on the interface vfc2
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77