Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 5 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 5
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer discovers that if the vPC peer link goes down, half of the devices in VLAN 20 experience connectivity issues with the external networks Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sheridan at Jan 12, 2025, 01:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-615 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Delbert
3 months ago
This question is as clear as mud. What's a vPC and why do I care about it? All I know is that I'm going to need a vPCAdvisor to help me out here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
Option A? Really? A dedicated Layer 3 link between vPC peers? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Let's keep it simple, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Chu
2 months ago
D) Exclude the non-vPC VLANs from vPC peer link
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
2 months ago
C) Add the non-vPC SVIs in the dual-active exclude VLAN list
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
2 months ago
B) Allow non-vPC VLANs on a second trunk between the two vPC peers
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
2 months ago
A) Configure a dedicated Layer 3 link between vPC peers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elizabeth
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Allowing non-vPC VLANs on a second trunk or excluding the non-vPC SVIs from the dual-active list both sound plausible. Decisions, decisions!
upvoted 0 times
Theron
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that could work. But allowing non-vPC VLANs on a second trunk also seems like a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
3 months ago
User 1: I think excluding the non-vPC VLANs from the dual-active list might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julian
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) Exclude the non-vPC VLANs from vPC peer link could also resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
I agree with Jettie, having a dedicated Layer 3 link would prevent connectivity issues if the vPC peer link goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
3 months ago
I'm going with D. Excluding the non-vPC VLANs from the vPC peer link seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
2 months ago
Craig: Let's go with D then. It should help stabilize the connectivity for VLAN 20.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
3 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like the most direct way to solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
3 months ago
User 1: I think D is the best option too. It will prevent the non-vPC VLANs from causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettyann
3 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Excluding the non-vPC SVIs from the dual-active list should resolve the issue without too much hassle.
upvoted 0 times
Ardella
2 months ago
Yes, I have. It worked perfectly in my case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
2 months ago
Has anyone tried this solution before?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
I agree, excluding the non-vPC SVIs from the dual-active list should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
3 months ago
Option C seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure a dedicated Layer 3 link between vPC peers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77