Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All 300-615 Questions]

The external routes fail to propagate to leaf switches in Cisco ACI fabric Which two actions resolve the issue? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dierdre
1 months ago
Alright, let's think this through. B and D seem like the most logical choices to me. Although, I have to admit, the 'VTEP pool' in option A does sound kinda fun. Maybe I'll try that one just for kicks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 months ago
Ha, I bet the person who wrote this question was trying to trick us. 'Propagate to leaf switches'? More like 'propagate to the cafeteria' am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
17 days ago
A) Enable the VTEP pool in the fabric
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doug
2 months ago
Hold up, why do we need to configure an MP-BGP area? That seems like overkill for a simple routing problem. I'd stick with the more straightforward options, like B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
9 days ago
I think specifying the spine nodes as route reflectors is crucial for proper route propagation. Options C and E could be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
13 days ago
Enabling the VTEP pool in the fabric might also help with the routing issue. So, options A and D could be good choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
22 days ago
I agree, configuring an MP-BGP area does seem unnecessary. I would go with options B and D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micheline
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Shouldn't we also specify the spine nodes as route reflectors? That's what option C suggests, and it sounds like it could help with the propagation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 months ago
I believe specifying the spine nodes as route reflectors could be another solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
I agree with Mona. Assigning an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric might also resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answers are B and D. Assigning an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric and associating the correct contract to the L3Out should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
1 months ago
Exactly, those two actions should help propagate the routes to the leaf switches in the Cisco ACI fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
2 months ago
Got it, so B and D are the correct answers to resolve the issue with external routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
Yes, that's one of the correct actions. We also need to associate the correct contract to the L3Out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
2 months ago
I agree, assigning an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
3 months ago
I think enabling the VTEP pool in the fabric could help.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77