Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-615 Topic 3 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 3
[All 300-615 Questions]

A customer reports that the Chassis Management Controller fails to receive chassis information from Cisco UCS Manager. Which set of steps resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brett
5 days ago
Haha, this question is a real 'chassis' to solve! But seriously, I think C is the way to go. Gotta make sure those cables are in tip-top shape.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
12 days ago
I agree with Bettye, A seems like the right choice based on the steps provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
1 months ago
But A makes sense because it mentions verifying different software levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B says you only need one cable, but option C says you need two. I'm leaning towards C, but it's a tough call.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
8 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Having two cables seems more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
17 days ago
User 1: I think option C is the way to go. It covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettye
1 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
Option A looks pretty good to me. Checking the firmware and cables as well as reseating the IOM seems like a thorough troubleshooting process.
upvoted 0 times
Isaac
8 days ago
User 3: I agree, checking all those steps should help resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
20 days ago
User 2: Yeah, reseating the IOM could fix the issue. It's a good troubleshooting process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the way to go. Checking firmware and cables is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Matching software levels and verifying multiple cables seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
Tyisha
1 months ago
Let's go with option C and see if that resolves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
1 months ago
I think checking multiple cables is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77