Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 9 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 9
[All 300-610 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A customer requires a VXLAN fabric deployment with these requirements:

* DNS must be a shared service.

* Users will not require direct sharing of resources with other users.

* The deployment must use the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.

Which action must the customer take to meet these criteria?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Charlena
1 months ago
I'm with Ettie on this one. VXLAN can be a real brain-twister, but I think Tonette and Bernadine have the right idea. Time to put on my thinking cap and nail this question!
upvoted 0 times
Isabelle
8 days ago
Let's go with that option then. Thanks for the input, guys!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
15 days ago
I agree, that seems like the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
21 days ago
I think the answer is to encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
1 months ago
Hmm, this question is making my head spin. At least it's not as bad as that time I tried to configure a VXLAN fabric while blindfolded. That was a real nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I agree with Tonette that option C is the way to go. Encapsulating the traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002 sounds like the simplest and most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Kaycee
7 days ago
Let's go with encapsulating traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
18 days ago
Agreed, it seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
19 days ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
2 months ago
Options A and B don't seem to address the requirement of using the least configuration intensive approach for route leaking. Option D would encapsulate the traffic on the wrong VTEP, so that's not the right choice either.
upvoted 0 times
Tresa
1 months ago
Looks like option C is the best choice for the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
1 months ago
Exactly, it also ensures that DNS is a shared service and users do not directly share resources with each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 months ago
That makes sense, it meets the requirement of using the least configuration intensive approach for route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Romana
2 months ago
C) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
2 months ago
The question is asking about the best way to set up a VXLAN fabric deployment with specific requirements. I think option C is the correct answer since VTEP1 should encapsulate the traffic with VNI 3002 to meet the criteria of a shared DNS service and no direct resource sharing between users.
upvoted 0 times
Elina
1 months ago
Yes, VTEP1 encapsulating traffic with VNI 3002 aligns with the criteria mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the best choice for meeting the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
2 months ago
But the requirements mention using the least configuration intensive approach, so VTEP1 with VNI 3002 makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe encapsulating traffic on VTEP2 with VNI 5000 is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
3 months ago
I think the customer should encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77