Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 8 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 8
[All 300-610 Questions]

An engineer must design a secondary site to prevent a catastrophic primary site failure. The applications must communicate across sites via the data link layer of the OSI model. The Layer 3 transport that is available for this solution consists of 10-Gb connections over Layer 3.

Which two solutions meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mira
1 months ago
Wait, did they just throw in 'ISIS' as a joke? That's a bit dark, don't you think? *chuckles nervously*
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 months ago
I'm going with OTV and VXLANEVPN. Can't go wrong with the latest and greatest in data center networking tech, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 months ago
This is a no-brainer! OTV and VXLANEVPN are the way to go. I bet the exam writers are just trying to trick us with those other options.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
5 days ago
Yeah, those two options provide the necessary Layer 3 transport for communication across sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
21 days ago
I agree, OTV and VXLANEVPN are definitely the best choices for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about vPC. Isn't that more for redundancy within a single site? I think OSPF and ISIS are out too since they operate at Layer 3.
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
8 days ago
Teddy: What about VXLANEVPN? Could that be a solution as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, OTV allows for communication between sites at the data link layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
16 days ago
User 1: I think OTV could work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettina
2 months ago
Hmm, OTV and VXLANEVPN seem like the obvious choices here. Connecting sites at Layer 2 with OTV and using VXLAN for the Layer 3 transport sounds exactly like what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
I'm not sure about VXLANEVPN. I think OSPF could also be a valid solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 months ago
I agree with Colette. OTV and VXLANEVPN both support Layer 3 transport over 10-Gb connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
2 months ago
I think OTV and VXLANEVPN could meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77