Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All 300-610 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. FCoE is used in the topology between the SAN Storage devices and SAN-Core routers. After noticing traffic drops to hosts accessing SAN-B storage, the engineering team wants to reduce the oversubscription ratio in the topology. Which action must the team take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cherelle
1 months ago
I bet the engineering team is scratching their heads, trying to figure out where all those socks are disappearing to in the SAN. Maybe they need to hire a better sock-tracking system.
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
10 days ago
Maybe that will improve the oversubscription ratio in the topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
11 days ago
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
12 days ago
That could help with the traffic drops to SAN-B storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
19 days ago
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
1 months ago
Wait, what's a 'SAN-Coro'? Is that some sort of new dance move? Just kidding, I think the answer is clear - more bandwidth between the storage devices is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Hyun
7 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like the best solution to reduce oversubscription.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
19 days ago
User 1: I think we need to increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Increasing the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices seems like it might do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Salina
11 days ago
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
19 days ago
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
2 months ago
Nah, man. Prioritizing the traffic is not the solution here. We need to upgrade the capacity to handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
Paulina
10 days ago
Nah, man. Prioritizing the traffic is not the solution here. We need to upgrade the capacity to handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
11 days ago
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
1 months ago
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
Aha! Increasing the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage is the way to go. That's the key bottleneck in this setup.
upvoted 0 times
Delisa
6 days ago
Rolf: No, increasing the bandwidth is the priority in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
27 days ago
User 3: Should we also configure QoS to prioritize SAN-A traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
1 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that should help reduce the oversubscription ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
User 1: We need to increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
2 months ago
But wouldn't configuring QoS to prioritize SAN-B traffic also help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
3 months ago
I agree with Joanna. That would help reduce the oversubscription ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
I think we should increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77