Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 6 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam

Question #: 92
Topic #: 6

A Cisco engineer is analyzing a customer environment where dozens of VMs are running on a physical server and UCS chassis are cascaded The setup uses two ISLs in a port channel to the SAN switch (per fabric) The oversubscription from VM to physical SAN port is often 20 (VMs/host) x 72 (9 UCS chassis cascaded = 72 hosts): 2 (ISLs from fabric interconnect to SAN switch port on the NPV core (NPIV enabled switch) This results to 20 x 72 2 per single ISL = 720 VMs per ISL

20 (VMs per host) x 8 (hosts per chassis) x 9 (chassis per port channel to SAN switch) / 2 (ISLs per port channel) = 20 x 8 x 9 / 2 = 720 VMs per SAN F-port What is the best way to resolve possible IOPS bottleneck?

ADeploy a content delivery network

BEnable Windows 1Gb server full duplex

CConfigure 802 1Qbb priority flow control

DRemove data encryption on the SSD

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Corinne at Jul 06, 2024, 04:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jenise

2 months ago

720 VMs per ISL, huh? That's a lot of traffic to handle. I bet the engineers who designed this setup were like, 'What could possibly go wrong?'

upvoted 0 times

Tyra

16 days ago

C: Removing data encryption on the SSD might also improve performance, don't you think?

upvoted 0 times

...

Amos

19 days ago

C: Configuring 802 1Qbb priority flow control might also be a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aide

21 days ago

B: Maybe enabling Windows 1Gb server full duplex could help with the IOPS bottleneck.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

1 months ago

B: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. It could prioritize important data and prevent bottlenecks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsay

1 months ago

A: I know right, that's a huge number of VMs per ISL!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

1 months ago

A: I think configuring 802.1Qbb priority flow control could help manage the traffic better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eura

2 months ago

Enabling 1Gb server full duplex? B) Enable Windows 1Gb server full duplex? I think the question is looking for a solution that actually addresses the problem, not something that would make it worse.

upvoted 0 times

Vonda

27 days ago

D: I don't think removing data encryption is the best solution here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julian

1 months ago

C: D) Remove data encryption on the SSD

upvoted 0 times

...

Thad

2 months ago

B: That sounds like a good solution to address the IOPS bottleneck.

upvoted 0 times

...

Idella

2 months ago

A: C) Configure 802 1Qbb priority flow control

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

2 months ago

Wait, did you say 'content delivery network' as an option? A) Deploy a content delivery network? What does that have to do with a SAN switch bottleneck? Seriously?

upvoted 0 times

...

Onita

2 months ago

Removing data encryption on the SSD? Yeah, right, like that's going to solve an IOPS bottleneck. D) is definitely not the answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 months ago

I'm not sure about that. I think enabling Windows 1Gb server full duplex might also be a good solution to improve data transfer speeds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystal

2 months ago

I agree with Becky. Configuring 802.1Qbb priority flow control can help prioritize traffic and improve performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Becky

2 months ago

I think the best way to resolve the IOPS bottleneck is to configure 802.1Qbb priority flow control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

2 months ago

I would go with option C as well. It seems like the most logical solution to address the bottleneck issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maybelle

2 months ago

Hmm, 720 VMs per ISL? That's a lot of traffic to handle. I think C) Configure 802.1Qbb priority flow control might be the way to go, but I'd need to look into that more.

upvoted 0 times

Katy

1 months ago

I think C) Configure 802.1Qbb priority flow control is a good option to consider. It could definitely help with the IOPS bottleneck issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

2 months ago

That's a huge number of VMs per ISL. I agree, configuring 802.1Qbb priority flow control could help manage the traffic better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

3 months ago

I agree with Adelaide. Configuring 802.1Qbb priority flow control can help prioritize traffic and improve performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

3 months ago

I think the best way to resolve the IOPS bottleneck is to configure 802.1Qbb priority flow control.

upvoted 0 times

...