Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 6 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 6
[All 300-610 Questions]

A company has added a new FCoE storage array to increase the performance of datastore access for end users. This storage array is directly connected to the Cisco Nexus 5672UP switches using four 10G port-channel interfaces. After deployment, the end users fail to access the datastore compared to the older solution. A network engineer verified the port-channel interface and finds that the congestion occurs when PFC frames are generated at the FCoE ingress interface. Which action must be taken to resolve the congestion issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Benton
1 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if the network engineer tried turning it off and on again? You know, the classic IT solution for everything.
upvoted 0 times
Kasandra
8 days ago
User 2: No, that's not the solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
17 days ago
User 1: Did you try turning it off and on again?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
2 months ago
A) Reserve bandwidth for FCoE VLAN? Sounds like a good idea, but wouldn't that just waste resources if the FCoE traffic isn't that heavy? I'd go with the QoS option.
upvoted 0 times
Brent
7 days ago
C) Increase the queuing buffer in the port-channel interface connected to the storage array.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
10 days ago
A) Yeah, that makes sense. QoS would prioritize the FCoE traffic without wasting bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
27 days ago
B) Enable the FCoE class in QoS on Cisco Nexus 5672UP switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
2 months ago
D) Adding an additional FCoE VLAN? Really? That's like trying to fit more people in a crowded bus - it just makes the problem worse!
upvoted 0 times
Carey
21 days ago
D) Adding an additional FCoE VLAN? Really? That's like trying to fit more people in a crowded bus - it just makes the problem worse!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 months ago
C) Increase the queuing buffer in the port-channel interface connected to the storage array.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
2 months ago
B) Enable the FCoE class in QoS on Cisco Nexus 5672UP switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
2 months ago
A) Reserve bandwidth for FCoE VLAN on the port-channel interface connected with storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yan
2 months ago
I think C) Increasing the queuing buffer might work too, but that's just a bandaid solution. We need to address the root cause, which is the FCoE traffic congestion.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
1 months ago
B) Enable the FCoE class in QoS on Cisco Nexus 5672UP switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
2 months ago
A) Reserve bandwidth for FCoE VLAN on the port-channel interface connected with storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
2 months ago
The correct answer is B) Enable the FCoE class in QoS on Cisco Nexus 5672UP switches. This will ensure that the FCoE traffic is prioritized and not affected by congestion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
2 months ago
That makes sense too. QoS can definitely help with prioritizing traffic. Let's see what others think before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go. Enabling the FCoE class in QoS can ensure that FCoE traffic gets the necessary priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Reserving bandwidth for FCoE VLAN can help prioritize traffic and prevent congestion.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77