Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All 300-610 Questions]

Which two configurations allow for routing traffic between two VDCs? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Myra at Feb 02, 2023, 09:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hillary
1 months ago
I'm going to go with B and E, because cross-connecting ports and accessing interfaces in other VDCs sounds like a recipe for disaster. What could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
1 months ago
Just when I thought I had this whole VDC thing figured out, they throw in a question like this. I'm going to go with C and D, because creating VRF-aware interfaces and policy maps sounds like the kind of techno-babble that would be on this exam.
upvoted 0 times
Jin
6 days ago
I'm pretty sure it's A and D that you need to configure for routing between VDCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
7 days ago
No, I believe it's B and C that allow for routing traffic between VDCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
9 days ago
I think A and E are the correct configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Long
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B and C. But then again, I'm also pretty sure I have no idea what a VDC is. Maybe I should have paid more attention in class.
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
5 days ago
User 2: Yeah, those seem like the right configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
14 days ago
User 1: I think the answer is B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with A and E, because who doesn't love an external Layer 3 device and the ability to access interfaces in other VDCs? It's like a VDC party!
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
12 days ago
User3: Agreed, those options seem like the best choice for routing traffic between VDCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, connecting to an external Layer 3 device and accessing interfaces in other VDCs sounds like a good plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 months ago
User1: I think A and E are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 months ago
User3: Definitely, those configurations should allow for routing traffic between the VDCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
1 months ago
User2: Agreed, connecting to an external Layer 3 device and accessing interfaces in other VDCs sounds like a good plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 months ago
User1: I think A and E are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nenita
2 months ago
Wait, are we supposed to choose two? I was just going to say C, but now I'm not sure. Maybe I'll just guess and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
I think B and C are the correct answers. Cross-connecting the ports and creating VRF-aware interfaces seem like the logical ways to route traffic between VDCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
3 months ago
But connecting to an external Layer 3 device and cross-connecting ports seem like the most logical options to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
3 months ago
I think the answer is A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77