Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-610 Topic 11 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 11
[All 300-610 Questions]

After experiencing traffic disruptions from the failure of a single router, a customer asks an engineer to design a solution that will prevent this from occurring in the future. While examining the customer's environment, the engineer discovers that the routers are manufactured by a variety of different vendors, and they have varying amounts of CPU and memory resources. Additionally, several of the customer's applications require the ability to fine-tune the load-balancing parameters between multiple routers. Which solution should be used to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nieves
2 months ago
GLBP is the clear winner here. With the variety of routers and the need for fine-tuning, it's the perfect solution. Reminds me of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole with the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Alberto
15 days ago
Yeah, GLBP stands out among the options given. It's the most suitable choice for this diverse environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
20 days ago
I agree, GLBP seems like the best fit for this situation. It's versatile and can meet the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 months ago
GLBP is definitely the way to go. It can handle the different router vendors and fine-tune load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanesa
2 months ago
GLBP is the answer, no doubt. Beats HSRP any day - it's like comparing a sports car to a tricycle.
upvoted 0 times
Carla
13 days ago
User 4: GLBP is the best choice for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
User 3: What about VRRP or FHRP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's much better than HSRP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
User 1: I think GLBP is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
2 months ago
VRRP could also work, but it doesn't offer the same level of granular control over load balancing that GLBP provides. I'd go with GLBP for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
2 months ago
I agree, GLBP is the way to go. The ability to distribute traffic across multiple routers is crucial to prevent future disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
But wouldn't VRRP be a more simple and reliable solution for router redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
2 months ago
GLBP seems like the best option here. It allows for load balancing across multiple routers from different vendors and provides more flexibility in terms of fine-tuning the parameters.
upvoted 0 times
Rima
28 days ago
User 2: Yeah, GLBP can handle load balancing across different routers and offers more customization options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
1 months ago
User 1: I think GLBP would be a good choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
FHRP could work, but GLBP is definitely the most versatile solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 months ago
VRRP and HSRP are good options too, but GLBP seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
2 months ago
I agree, GLBP offers more flexibility in fine-tuning parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
GLBP is a good choice for load balancing across different routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawn
2 months ago
I agree with Jovita, GLBP can handle the varying resources and fine-tune load-balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
3 months ago
I think we should use GLBP for load-balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77