Cisco Exam 300-535 Topic 9 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-535 exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 9

An engineer wants to replace the BLOCK_BAD ACL on the Cisco IOS XE router with this new content. The engineer wants to use RESTCONF for this and constructs a PUT request to the resource/restconf/data/native/ip/access-list/Cisco-IOS-XE-acl:extended=BLOCK_BAD. What must the body look like to achieve the Cisco IOS XE configuration?

Desired configutation:

ip access-list extended BLOCK_BAD

permit ip any host 192.168.20.1

deny ip any any

AOption A

BOption B

COption C

DOption D

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Marjory at Nov 17, 2024, 02:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-535 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ashlee

6 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option A. It just has a certain je ne sais quoi, you know? Plus, who doesn't love a good 'permit ip any host' statement?

upvoted 0 times

Xochitl

5 months ago

User4: Option A it is then. It definitely has that je ne sais quoi the configuration needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

5 months ago

I agree, Option A seems like the way to go. Can't go wrong with that configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christene

5 months ago

User3: I agree, Option A is the most suitable. It aligns with the desired 'permit ip any host' statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rose

5 months ago

Option A looks good to me too. That 'permit ip any host' statement is always a winner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

6 months ago

User2: Yeah, Option A seems like the best choice. 'permit ip any host' is a key part of the configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

6 months ago

User1: I think Option A is the way to go. It looks like it matches the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

7 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option D just to be different, you know? Keeps the exam folks on their toes!

upvoted 0 times

Merlyn

6 months ago

User 4: I'm going with Option D, just to mix things up a bit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

6 months ago

User 3: Option C looks like the best match to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

6 months ago

User 2: I'm leaning towards Option B, it seems like the right fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

6 months ago

User 1: I think Option A is the correct choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buddy

7 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think Option C makes sense based on the configuration provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

7 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. The options all look similar, but I think Option B might be the best fit based on the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricki

7 months ago

Option C looks like the right configuration to me. The structure and syntax match what the engineer wants to achieve.

upvoted 0 times

My

7 months ago

Option C is the most suitable one here. It mirrors the required configuration for the ACL replacement using RESTCONF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

7 months ago

I think Option C is the best fit for this scenario. It closely resembles the desired configuration for the Cisco IOS XE router.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylou

7 months ago

Yes, Option C has the correct structure for the PUT request. It aligns with the engineer's goal of replacing the BLOCK_BAD ACL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

7 months ago

I agree, Option C seems to be the correct choice. The body of the PUT request should match the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

7 months ago

I agree with Ceola, Option C seems to match the desired configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

7 months ago

I think the body must look like Option C.

upvoted 0 times

...