Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-535 Topic 13 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-535 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 13
[All 300-535 Questions]

Which two data formats are human readable? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Herman
1 months ago
I bet the person who wrote this question is a secret robot trying to test our ability to decode their machine languages. YAML and JSON are the only sane choices here.
upvoted 0 times
Doretha
14 days ago
I agree, those are the most common ones used for easy readability.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
15 days ago
YAML and JSON are definitely the human readable data formats.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
James
1 months ago
If gRPC is human-readable, then I must be a computer. I'll stick with YAML and JSON, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
Stephanie
12 days ago
I agree, gRPC seems too complex. YAML and JSON are much more user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
15 days ago
YAML and JSON are definitely the way to go. They're much easier to read than gRPC.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Markus
2 months ago
I once tried to read some Apache Arrow data. It felt like staring at a bunch of arrows flying around on the screen. Not very human-friendly if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Filiberto
10 days ago
YAML is great for configuration files, and JSON is widely used for APIs. Both are much easier to read compared to Apache Arrow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
12 days ago
Yeah, Apache Arrow can be a bit tricky to read. I prefer YAML and JSON for human-readable data formats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
14 days ago
E) JSON
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
17 days ago
A) YAML
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
2 months ago
Isn't binary just a bunch of 1s and 0s? Definitely not human-readable. But YAML and JSON make sense as the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
10 hours ago
I agree, YAML and JSON are both text-based formats that are easy for humans to read and write.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 days ago
Yes, binary is definitely not human-readable. YAML and JSON are the ones that are easy for us to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 days ago
Binary may be efficient for machines, but YAML and JSON are the way to go for human readability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
25 days ago
I agree, YAML and JSON are the correct answers because they are designed to be easily readable by humans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 months ago
YAML and JSON are much easier for humans to read compared to binary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
1 months ago
YAML and JSON are the correct answers. Binary is just a bunch of 1s and 0s, not human-readable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
Yes, binary is definitely not human-readable. YAML and JSON are the two data formats that are human-readable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
2 months ago
Yes, binary is definitely not human-readable. YAML and JSON are the two data formats that are human-readable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delisa
2 months ago
YAML and JSON are definitely human-readable formats. The others like binary and gRPC are more for machine-to-machine communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 months ago
I'm not sure about Apache Arrow and gRPC, but I know binary is not human readable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 months ago
I agree with you, Vivan. YAML and JSON are easier for humans to read and write.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
2 months ago
I think YAML and JSON are human readable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77