Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-535 Topic 11 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-535 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 11
[All 300-535 Questions]

Which data format should be used to serialize structured data in the most compact way?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Blondell
1 months ago
XML? Might as well just send the data in a carrier pigeon. JSON is the way to go, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
1 months ago
I hear Protobufs are the solution to all my serialization woes. They're like JSON, but with magic and unicorns!
upvoted 0 times
Elmira
13 days ago
JSON is good too, but protobufs are more compact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
19 days ago
Yeah, protobufs are great for structured data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
21 days ago
I think protobufs are the way to go for compact serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queenie
2 months ago
JSON all the way! It's the industry standard for serializing data, and the compact syntax is perfect for this.
upvoted 0 times
Alise
8 days ago
I prefer YAML for structured data serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
12 days ago
I think protobufs are more efficient for compact serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
20 days ago
I agree, JSON is definitely the way to go for compact serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nikita
2 months ago
YAML is more human-readable than JSON, but I don't think it's as compact. XML is just too verbose for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
16 days ago
D) XML
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
28 days ago
I agree, JSON is the most compact option for serializing structured data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
29 days ago
C) JSON
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
2 months ago
A) protobufs
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leatha
2 months ago
Protobufs seem like the way to go here. They're designed for efficient serialization and are smaller than JSON in most cases.
upvoted 0 times
Paul
10 hours ago
I agree, protobufs are definitely the most compact option for serializing structured data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
10 days ago
XML can be quite verbose compared to other formats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
14 days ago
I prefer using JSON for its simplicity and readability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
17 days ago
YAML is also a good option for structured data serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
2 months ago
I agree, protobufs are definitely more compact than JSON.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgilio
2 months ago
I believe YAML is a good option as well, it strikes a balance between readability and compactness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
2 months ago
I prefer JSON because it is widely supported and easy to read.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
2 months ago
I think protobufs would be the best choice for compact serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
2 months ago
I think JSON is the most compact way to serialize structured data. It's lightweight and easy to read and write.
upvoted 0 times
Ailene
25 days ago
I find XML to be a bit bulky for serializing structured data. JSON is definitely more compact and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 months ago
JSON is my go-to choice for serializing structured data. It's lightweight and widely supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
1 months ago
I think YAML is a great option for serializing structured data. It's human-readable and easy to work with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
2 months ago
I prefer using protobufs for serializing structured data. It's more efficient and compact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aliza
2 months ago
I personally prefer JSON because it's more human-readable, even if it's not the most compact option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
3 months ago
I agree with Carin, protobufs are known for their efficiency in data serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
3 months ago
I think protobufs would be the best choice for compact serialization.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77