Cisco Exam 300-510 Topic 9 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam

Question #: 99
Topic #: 9

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. The service provider operations team was alerted that hub site traffic from BGP AS 65101 to AS 65201 uses a non-primary path via the R5-R6 link. IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up. and no fiber failure has been reported on the R2-R3 link The team determined that the traffic flow between 10.10.10.1 and 192.168.30.1 is not considering the R1-R2-R3-R4 path. Which action resolves this issue?

AChange the metric attribute to 20 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.

BChange the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10 10 5 on R1

CSet the local-preference to the default value with BGP neighbor 10 10.10.3 on R2 for receiving routes.

DAdd metric 5 with BGP neighbor 10.10.10.6 on R5for receiving routes.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Sarah at Sep 13, 2024, 12:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Crista

7 months ago

Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna have to go with option B and change the local-preference on R1. That should do the trick!

upvoted 0 times

Dierdre

6 months ago

I agree, let's go with option B and make that change on R1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

6 months ago

Yeah, that seems like the most logical solution to the issue with the traffic flow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sena

6 months ago

I think option B is the best choice too. Changing the local-preference on R1 makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeniffer

7 months ago

Hmm, that's interesting. I can see your point. Let's discuss further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

7 months ago

I agree with Brigette. Adjusting the local-preference on R1 seems like the most logical solution here. Why mess with the metric when we can just prioritize the preferred path?

upvoted 0 times

...

Brigette

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure changing the metric attribute on R1 is the right approach. Shouldn't we focus on the local-preference to influence the BGP path selection?

upvoted 0 times

Adrianna

6 months ago

Carmen: That could also be a valid option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

6 months ago

User 3: What about setting the local-preference to the default value on R2 for receiving routes?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmen

6 months ago

Yeah, that could help influence the BGP path selection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

7 months ago

I think changing the local-preference on R1 might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tabetha

7 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

7 months ago

The issue seems to be with the R1-R2-R3-R4 path not being considered. I think changing the local-preference attribute on R1 would be the best solution to resolve this.

upvoted 0 times